<i>Nasha Istoriia</i>: The Russian Revolutions, the State, School Textbooks and Public Celebrations Under Putin

Pearce, James C.

doi:10.1080/09546545.2019.1607422

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…as a phenomenon that is present in the culture of any nation, ethnic group, or country. The manifestation of patriotism is most often considered in a particular political context (Rousselet, 2020;Pearce, 2019), specific population groups (Lubsky, et al, 2016;Kolesnikova, et al, 2018;Morris, 2016), national ideas and movements (Anufrieva et al, 2018;Bakhlova et al, 2019;Emelin and Tkhostov, 2019;Polukhina and Vanke, 2019), but not as an objectively existing phenomenon that is of key importance for the institutionalization of the socio-cultural space necessary to preserve the identity of communities permanently residing on a particular territory. Partially, the politicization of patriotism is justified if keeping in mind that the very content of patriotism is interpreted differently across borders depending on the political order, prevailing cultural traditions, historical past and peoples' claims to a particular role in the world community (Hobbes, 2001;Berger and Lukman, 1995;Ivanova, 2004;Anufrieva et al, 2018;Danakari, 2019).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Patriotism as a Cultural Universal

Anufrieva

Derzhavin

Derzhavina

et al. 2020

HSSR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose of the study: The purpose of the article is to introduce the concept of patriotism into scientific circulation as a cultural universal as an alternative to the predominant politicization of this concept. The interpretation of this topic in various socio-political contexts presents a lot of discrepancies and contradictory characteristics associated with the ideological and political preferences of researchers. Methodology: The research methodology is based on a situational and interactive approach to the study of socio-cultural processes and phenomena that are present in the study of social systems, as well as in cross-cultural studies and research of intercultural communication. Main Findings: The main results of the study are the identification of the possibilities of an interactive and situational approach in the study of patriotism, the development of a common strategy for the formation of patriotism as a sequence of stages of socialization of an individual, and identification of the decisive influence of spiritual culture on the real social experience of a patriotic orientation. Applications of this study: The results of the study open up prospects for further study of patriotism as a cultural universal, regardless of a particular political regime or national and cultural characteristics of certain countries and peoples. This can significantly expand the concept of patriotism, without linking the latter only to the specifics of its interpretation in a particular society, ethnic group or community, maintaining the necessary balance between communication and interaction in the formation of patriotism. Novelty/Originality of this study: The novelty of the research consists in the use of an interactive and situational approach to the study and formation of patriotism, based on deep socio-anthropological patterns of formation and development of social groups and communities, as well as in the identified stages (situations and levels) of the formation of patriotism in real society, which can be quite stable and productive.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It was considered as one of the possibilities of searching for the "Russian idea", capable of consolidating Russian society (Bakhlova et al, 2019;Danakari, 2019;Dostoevskiy,2000). The following researchers considered the patriotism in modern Russia: J.C.Pearce (Pearce, 2019), K. Rousselet (Rousselet, 2020), A.V. Lubsky, Y.G.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Patriotism as a Cultural Universal

Anufrieva

Derzhavin

Derzhavina

et al. 2020

HSSR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Forum: Russia's Invasion of Ukraine: What Did We Miss?

Mahon

Pearce

Korobkov

et al. 2023

International Studies Perspectives

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This forum focuses on the overlooked areas of the moment surrounding the nature and progression of Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022. It brings together scholars of different disciplines, backgrounds, and locations to provide analyses of the Russian aggression from varying perspectives such as history, law, military studies, politics, and media and communications, to name a few, encouraging the authors to focus on intricacies to deliver a deeper analysis of the invasion. Each author offers a unique take on the analyses of the past and present. The forum has two aims. First, the collection raises the question “What did we miss?” and it aims to highlight the lack of attention by Western scholars to Russian perceptions of Western threats and the concerns of former Soviet countries regarding Russia's aggressive foreign policy. Second, the forum intends to start a conversation on different non-Western perspectives of thinking about the Russian invasion. The forum covers the events of the period from the beginning of the invasion up to July 2022, with some post-revision comments in the introduction and conclusion mentioning the events up to February 2023.

show abstract

The Foundations of Russian Statehood

Kortukov,

Waller

2024

Communist and Post-Communist Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The content of Russian educational material on moral-cultural issues has gradually shifted over the Putin tenure toward a standard that emphasizes state patriotism, syncretic pride in the achievements and heroes of the Tsarist, Soviet, and post-Soviet periods, and traditional sociocultural values, including respect for religious authorities. The onset of the 2022 Russo-Ukrainian War has caused a shift in debates over national pedagogic inculturation among domestic Russian elites, with many calling for the return of “ideology” to properly ensure the formation of future, regime-loyal generations. This article analyzes the first official document of the wartime period that deals with questions of Russia’s ideology—the educational curriculum guidance packet titled “Foundations of Russian Statehood” (FORS) and promoted by the Presidential Administration for use in Russian universities. The article typifies the state of pre-war Russian moral-cultural pedagogical material within its shifting, illiberal ideological context, compares this pre-war setting with the FORS document and the concomitant discursive shift among key Russian officials, and provides a descriptive analysis of FORS itself. In doing so, the article identifies the evocative “pentabasis” framework of the FORS document as a potential core of a crystallizing, official ideology in modern wartime Russia.

show abstract

Nasha Istoriia: The Russian Revolutions, the State, School Textbooks and Public Celebrations Under Putin

Cited by 3 publications

References 20 publications

Patriotism as a Cultural Universal

Patriotism as a Cultural Universal

Forum: Russia's Invasion of Ukraine: What Did We Miss?

The Foundations of Russian Statehood

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About