2011
DOI: 10.1021/je100676j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PρT Behavior of a Lean Synthetic Natural Gas Mixture Using Magnetic Suspension Densimeters and an Isochoric Apparatus: Part I

Abstract: Work shown in this paper reports measurements of fluid behavior and its dependence upon concentration in natural gas-like mixtures. These systematic experiments covering phase equilibrium and densities of selected mixtures use a state-of-the art apparatus. This work presents phase envelopes and density data for a synthetic natural gas-like mixture measured with an isochoric apparatus and a magnetic suspension densimeter. The isochoric apparatus permits precise, fast measurements using an automated procedure ov… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a recent work Acosta et al [63] developed a new computational method for the analysis of isochoric data to obtain phase envelope experimental data points, reporting that the phase boundary temperatures and pressures could be determined within 0.45% and 0.04%, respectively. Our research group has developed a systematic measurement program on selected natural gas-like mixtures using the isochoric method with the cell design reported in Figure 9 [64][65][66].…”
Section: Non-visual Synthetic Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent work Acosta et al [63] developed a new computational method for the analysis of isochoric data to obtain phase envelope experimental data points, reporting that the phase boundary temperatures and pressures could be determined within 0.45% and 0.04%, respectively. Our research group has developed a systematic measurement program on selected natural gas-like mixtures using the isochoric method with the cell design reported in Figure 9 [64][65][66].…”
Section: Non-visual Synthetic Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It basically consisted of a high-pressure measuring cell, which was installed inside a vacuum-insulated two-stage thermostat, a magnetic-suspension coupling incorporated in the measuring cell, and an analytical balance at the top of the apparatus. Both [29], C 2 H 6 [30], N 2 [28], CH 4 [31], natural gases [8,9,15,32,33] 5.0 mK [9] 0.01% of (40 or 200) MPa [28] 0.1% [9] Chamorro (250 to 400) K [25] Up to 20 MPa [25] 0 to 2000 kg/m 3 [25] CH 4 ÀN 2 [34], CO 2 ÀN 2 [10,35], CH 4 ÀCO 2 [36], COÀN 2 [37] 3.9 mK [25] (0.007 to 0.015)% of 20 MPa [25] (0.020 to 0.155)% [25] Kuramoto (293.15 to 473.15) K [22] Designed up to 20 MPa [22] n/a iso-Octane, n-nonane, n-tridecane, water, 2,4-dichlorotoluene, 3,4-dichlorotoluene, bromobenzene [22] 3.0 mK [22] n/a (6.7 to 11.7) ppm [22] Wagner (235 to 520) K [38] Up to 30 MPa [39] (2 to 2000) kg/m 3 [39] Cyclohexane, toluene, and ethanol [39], n-heptane, n-nonane, 2,4-dichlorotoluene, and bromobenzene [40], Ethylene, ethane, and sulfur hexafluoride [38], Ar and N 2 [41], CH 4 and CO 2 [42] 8.0 mK [39] 0 a The uncertainties listed, are just for information purposes and especially those estimated before 1990 are from a current point of view possibly not reliable because (i) the confidence probability was not provided in the original paper; (ii) there was no general standard to declare the measurement uncertainty at that time; or (iii) no complete analysis on the measurement uncertainty was done for these apparatuses. The...…”
Section: Apparatus Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The commonly used reference equations of state (EOS), e.g., for nitrogen [1], argon [2], carbon dioxide [3], ethane [4], ethylene [5], propane [6], and sulfur hexafluoride [7] were all modeled with the help of data measured with SSDs. Moreover, with the increasing demand for knowledge of volumetric properties of fluid mixtures, more measurements [8][9][10][11] were carried out utilizing different SSDs. However, in this context only accurate density data of binary mixtures serve to further improve the performance of multi-parameter EOS for mixtures, especially those based on the GERG EOS (GERG-2004 of Kunz et al [12] and GERG-2008 of Kunz and Wagner [13]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Gas Research Institute (Hwang et al, 1997;Magee et al, 1997) initiated a co-operative international project to establish a set of standard reference p-V-T data for five natural gas mixtures, where a Burnett apparatus was adopted to obtain the experimental results at 225-350 K for pressures to 11 MPa. A combined effort (Atilhan et al, 2011a(Atilhan et al, , 2011bMcLinden, 2011) between Qatar University, Texas A&M University, and the National Institute of Standards and Technology on the pressure-density-temperature behavior of natural gas was conducted in 2011, where an isochoric apparatus and a magnetic suspension densimeter were used to measure the p-ρ-T data of four synthetic natural gas mixtures at 250-450 K for pressures of up to 37 MPa. In consideration of the working conditions in the natural gas liquefaction processes, we choose the precise experimental results at 225-325 K for pressures of up to 11 MPa as the reference data for the evaluation of the SRK equation, the PR equation, the LKP equation and the GERG-2008 equation.…”
Section: Accuracy Analysis Of the Prediction Models For The Gas Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%