2014
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321577
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Planck2013 results. X. HFI energetic particle effects: characterization, removal, and simulation

Abstract: We describe the detection, interpretation, and removal of the signal resulting from interactions of high energy particles with the Planck High Frequency Instrument (HFI). There are two types of interactions: heating of the 0.1 K bolometer plate; and glitches in each detector time stream. The transient responses to detector glitch shapes are not simple single-pole exponential decays and fall into three families. The glitch shape for each family has been characterized empirically in flight data and these shapes … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this reason the dead time due to CR events is usually smaller than in bolometric detectors, where the time constant is in the 10 ms range (see e.g. [32,33]).…”
Section: Cosmic Ray Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason the dead time due to CR events is usually smaller than in bolometric detectors, where the time constant is in the 10 ms range (see e.g. [32,33]).…”
Section: Cosmic Ray Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These protons will penetrate the spacecraft and create secondary particles, depositing energy wherever they go: the detectors, the wafer, or other mechanical structures. This effect becomes significant at this level of instrument sensitivity, as was the case with the Planck Space mission [3]. This manuscript focusses specifically on the frequent impacts by CRs into the detector wafer, which create a baseline thermal fluctuation seen by the detectors, and whether the level of these fluctuations will affect the energy resolution of the instrument.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high rate (∼1 Hz) and long recovery times (as long as ∼2 s) of cosmic ray glitches led to significant analysis challenges and data loss [12]. Careful analyses of flight and laboratory data [13,14,12] led to successful cosmological analysis and elucidated several glitch classes corresponding to energy depositions in different regions of the detector assembly. Cosmic ray response is thus a key performance consideration for future space-based bolometric instruments, which will face the added complications of large shared wafers and crosstalk within multiplexed readout wiring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To calibrate expectations, we make a crude estimate of the cosmic ray response of a SPIDER detector array by combining Planck 's estimated cosmic ray flux (∼5/cm 2 /s above 40 MeV [12]) and the stopping power of a minimum-ionizing particle. This suggests typical energy depositions in the bolometer island of order a few hundred eV every ∼10 minutes, with perhaps a similar rate on the suspension legs; a more detailed Monte Carlo model incorporating realistic incident energies and particle showers is left to future work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%