2005
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0409450102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pseudomonas syringae manipulates systemic plant defenses against pathogens and herbivores

Abstract: Many pathogens are virulent because they specifically interfere with host defense responses and therefore can proliferate. Here, we report that virulent strains of the bacterial phytopathogen Pseudomonas syringae induce systemic susceptibility to secondary P. syringae infection in the host plant Arabidopsis thaliana. This systemic induced susceptibility (SIS) is in direct contrast to the well studied avirulence͞R gene-dependent resistance response known as the hypersensitive response that elicits systemic acqu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
219
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 256 publications
(226 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
(105 reference statements)
6
219
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our presented results rule out a decisive role of the JA pathway during SAR because systemic resistance in the JA biosynthesis mutants dde2 and opr3, as well as in the downstream signaling mutants coi1, jar1, and jin1, is significantly enhanced in response to a local Psm inoculation ( Figure 8B). A SAR-positive phenotype for coi1 mutants has also been reported by Cui et al (2005). The correlation between SAR, JA petiole exudation, and systemic JA elevation reported by Truman et al (2007) is questionable because it was not tested in this study whether the high inoculum (OD 0.2) used for analytical JA determinations indeed induces a SAR response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our presented results rule out a decisive role of the JA pathway during SAR because systemic resistance in the JA biosynthesis mutants dde2 and opr3, as well as in the downstream signaling mutants coi1, jar1, and jin1, is significantly enhanced in response to a local Psm inoculation ( Figure 8B). A SAR-positive phenotype for coi1 mutants has also been reported by Cui et al (2005). The correlation between SAR, JA petiole exudation, and systemic JA elevation reported by Truman et al (2007) is questionable because it was not tested in this study whether the high inoculum (OD 0.2) used for analytical JA determinations indeed induces a SAR response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…In addition, we have never detected increased levels of JA or OPDA in distant tissue under these conditions (Mishina et al, 2008). Taken together, data from our and other laboratories (Cui et al, 2005;Chaturvedi et al, 2008) argue against a significant function of the JA pathway during SAR establishment and long-distance signaling. Moreover, the wild-type-like SAR-inducing capacity of Pst cor 2 mutants reveals that bacterial production of the JA-Ile-mimicking phytotoxin coronatine does not affect the SAR process, neither positively nor negatively ( Figure 9B).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…For instance, some P. syringae pathovars have shown an ability to synthesize ET both in vitro and in planta from Met through the 2-keto-4-methylthiobutyric acid pathway (Weingart et al, 2001). This ability, together with the production of the JA mimic coronatine and auxins by the same microorganisms, is assumed to contribute to hormonal saturation and consequent circumvention of effectual defenses (Cui et al, 2005;Sreedharan et al, 2006). More recently, Ralstonia solanacearum has been seen to produce ET by means of the HrpG regulon (Valls et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As expected, DDE2 was not required for induction by Pma ES4326, because this strain produces the JA-Ile mimic, coronatine (Cui et al, 2005;Katsir et al, 2008). We studied diagnostic mutants to distinguish the roles of two branches of JA signaling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%