2021
DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retracted: Endometrial scratch injury in infertile women seeking conception through natural or intrauterine insemination cycles: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Abstract: Implantation is the attachment of the developing embryo to the uterine wall followed by its penetration to the maternal circulatory system to form the future placenta. 1 The embryo invades the endometrium completely only in great apes and humans. Implantation is restricted in both time and space. This implantation window begins 2-3 days after the fertilized ovum reaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(56 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This procedure, rated amber on the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) rating system, has been very popular over the last years worldwide (Lensen et al, 2016;Palomba et al, 2023b). Various reviews and meta-analyses (Maged et al, 2023;Palomba et al, 2023a;van Hoogenhuijze et al, 2023), including a Cochrane review (Lensen et al, 2021a), underline that it is unclear whether this procedure increases the chance of implantation and live birth and, if so, for whom, and how the scratch should be performed. Beside the uncertainty regarding its effectiveness, concerns have been raised due to the similar weakness in the quality of evidence both for and against ES.…”
Section: Evidence-based Medicine and Fertility Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This procedure, rated amber on the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) rating system, has been very popular over the last years worldwide (Lensen et al, 2016;Palomba et al, 2023b). Various reviews and meta-analyses (Maged et al, 2023;Palomba et al, 2023a;van Hoogenhuijze et al, 2023), including a Cochrane review (Lensen et al, 2021a), underline that it is unclear whether this procedure increases the chance of implantation and live birth and, if so, for whom, and how the scratch should be performed. Beside the uncertainty regarding its effectiveness, concerns have been raised due to the similar weakness in the quality of evidence both for and against ES.…”
Section: Evidence-based Medicine and Fertility Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a more detailed insight, many reviews and meta-analytic publications were published concerning this topic, which seems to be declining but is still under a heated debate (reviewed i.a. in [ 171 , 172 , 173 , 174 , 175 , 176 , 177 , 178 ]).…”
Section: Clinical Significance In Reproductive Medicinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recurrent implantation failure Thin endometrial lining Scratching [171][172][173][174][175][176][177][178], PRP infusion [183][184][185][186][187][188], G-CSF [267,269,270] Wound-healing-like Decidualization, Regeneration…”
Section: Balanced Inflammatory Micromilieumentioning
confidence: 99%