2003
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2003.08.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

I-Risk: development of an integrated technical and management risk methodology for chemical installations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…6.6 The risk map and Scenarios Forecasted could be used to enhance the resilience level 6.8 may negatively influence workers safety (Papazoglou et al, 2003), this perhaps cannot be considered as unexpected for the literature, but in this real case we can say that the organization is unprepared to deal with this problem, and this analysis detects this situation. It is true that the C5 Event does not impact directly on R2.…”
Section: Questionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6.6 The risk map and Scenarios Forecasted could be used to enhance the resilience level 6.8 may negatively influence workers safety (Papazoglou et al, 2003), this perhaps cannot be considered as unexpected for the literature, but in this real case we can say that the organization is unprepared to deal with this problem, and this analysis detects this situation. It is true that the C5 Event does not impact directly on R2.…”
Section: Questionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A better understanding of the drivers of human behaviour (Reason) and the way companies are managed (Hudson) lead to more sophisticated models including performance shaping factor, delivery systems and safety barrier maintenance models (Papazoglou et al, 2003;.…”
Section: Human Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several models and methods for quantification of the influence of organisational factors on the total risk are described in the literature [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. These models and methods were reviewed and compared in view of the criteria (1)-(9) above.…”
Section: Research Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DOI Several models and methods for incorporating organisational factors in QRAs or probabilistic risk assessments (PRA) have been proposed. Among these are Manager [10], MACHINE (Model of Accident Causation using Hierarchical Influence Network) [11], ISM (Integrated Safety Method) [12], WPAM (The Work Process Analysis Model) [13,14], I-RISK (Integrated Risk) [15][16][17], the -factor model [18], SAM (System Action Management) [19,20], ORIM (Organisational Risk Influence Model) [21,22], and ARAMIS [23]. These models/methods have been developed and described in the literature in the last 15 years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%