2004
DOI: 10.1080/09583150310001655693
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Steinernema carpocapsae(Rhabditida: Steinernematidae) as a biological control agent against the fungus GnatBradysia agrestis(Diptera: Sciaridae) in propagation houses

Abstract: A recently introduced fungus gnat, Bradysia agrestis, has caused serious problems in Korean propagation houses where vegetable seedlings are produced for transplant into the fields. Although chemical insecticides are available against this pest, alternate control measures are needed. A Korean isolate of the entomopathogenic nematode, Steinernema carpocapsae Pocheon strain, was tested against this insect in the laboratory and propagation house. In the laboratory, S. carpocapsae affected oviposition, with the un… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Gouge & Hague (1995) established that S. carpocapsae was relatively ineffective against different sciarid species. The results obtained in the present work are in agreement with this, but contradict those of Kim et al (2004), who found that S. carpocapsae can be an effective tool for the management of the fungus gnat larvae. Both nematode species were applied together so that each could combat its own target pest.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 44%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Gouge & Hague (1995) established that S. carpocapsae was relatively ineffective against different sciarid species. The results obtained in the present work are in agreement with this, but contradict those of Kim et al (2004), who found that S. carpocapsae can be an effective tool for the management of the fungus gnat larvae. Both nematode species were applied together so that each could combat its own target pest.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 44%
“…For the control of sciarids with nematodes, many authors defend the use of S. feltiae, having observed effectiveness between 66 and 95%, depending on the fly population and the timing of nematode application (Scheepmaker et al, 1997;Shamshad et al, 2008). In the case of S. carpocapsae, Gouge & Hague (1995) reported the relative inefficacy of this species against sciarids, whereas other authors defend its efficacy, but with a lower infectivity than that of S. feltiae (Kim et al, 2004). Furthermore, some authors observed a detrimental effect of treatments involving entomophathogenic nematodes on mushroom mycelia, such as reduced yield in early flushes, depending on the nematode dosage rate (Grewal et al, 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences in host size and immune response can affect the susceptibility of nematodes among the instars of an insect species (Kaya 1990). Kim et al (2004) noted that the first and second instars of Bradysia agretis (Diptera: Sciaridae) showed lower levels of susceptibility to the nematode compared to older instars. In our study, the small size of the neonate larvae of C. sordidus (1.5-2.0 mm) was not a limiting factor for the infestation of the EPNs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Kim et al 83 tested Steinernema carpocapsae (Weiser) against Bradysia agrestis , a serious problem in Korean propagation houses, under laboratory conditions. Their results indicated that S. carpocapsae affected oviposition: treated females averaged 7 ± 2 eggs compared with an untreated average of 121 ± 25 eggs.…”
Section: Control Of Mushroom Flies By Biocontrol Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%