2014
DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2014.957656
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

I thought that I heard you laughing: Contextual facial expressions modulate the perception of authentic laughter and crying

Abstract: It is well established that categorising the emotional content of facial expressions may differ depending on contextual information. Whether this malleability is observed in the auditory domain and in genuine emotion expressions is poorly explored. We examined the perception of authentic laughter and crying in the context of happy, neutral and sad facial expressions. Participants rated the vocalisations on separate unipolar scales of happiness and sadness and on arousal. Although they were instructed to focus … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
23
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a role can be hypothesized from previous studies. In line with findings for faces, motor system activation, in primary motor, premotor, and supplementary motor sites, is seen for the perception of emotional vocalizations (Bestelmeyer et al, 2014;Lima et al, 2015;Lima et al, 2016b;McGettigan et al, 2015;O'Nions et al, 2017). This is particularly the case for positive vocalizations like laughter, possibly reflecting the contagiousness of these expressions (Warren et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Such a role can be hypothesized from previous studies. In line with findings for faces, motor system activation, in primary motor, premotor, and supplementary motor sites, is seen for the perception of emotional vocalizations (Bestelmeyer et al, 2014;Lima et al, 2015;Lima et al, 2016b;McGettigan et al, 2015;O'Nions et al, 2017). This is particularly the case for positive vocalizations like laughter, possibly reflecting the contagiousness of these expressions (Warren et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The laughter stimuli consisted of 30 genuine and 30 posed laughs. We used vocalizations produced by several male and female speakers previously validated and used in behavioral and neuroimaging experiments [ 7 , 59 ]. They were generated by six speakers (three female) in a sound-proof anechoic chamber at University College London.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genuine laughter was elicited using an amusement induction situation in a social interactive setting: speakers were shown video clips, which they had identified beforehand as amusing and that would easily cause them to laugh aloud; the experimenters, who had known all the speakers for a long time, interacted with them throughout the recording session to promote the naturalness and the social nature of the laughs (as they occur between friends in everyday interactions). Procedural details are provided elsewhere [ 7 , 59 ]. For posed laughter, the speakers were asked to simulate laughter in the absence of any external stimulation, and they were encouraged to make it sound natural and positive.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They were generated by seven adults (four female) in a sound-proof anechoic chamber at University College London. Spontaneous laughter was elicited using an amusement induction situation: each speaker was shown video clips, which they identified beforehand as amusing and that would easily cause them to laugh aloud 31 65 . For posed laughter, the speakers simulated laughter in the absence of external stimulation, while trying to make the expression sound credible.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%