2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“I” value competence but “we” value social competence: The moderating role of voters' individualistic and collectivistic orientation in political elections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(43 reference statements)
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, we decided to discard all elections for which we were not able to find a suitable photo for both candidates. Our sample of 75 constituencies was larger than that of most studies which previously examined (and found) effects of facial appearance on election outcomes (Castelli et al, 2009;Chen et al, 2012Chen et al, , 2014Chen et al, , 2016Rule et al, 2010). Nonetheless, it might have been insufficient to detect regional differences in the effect of perceived trustworthiness.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, we decided to discard all elections for which we were not able to find a suitable photo for both candidates. Our sample of 75 constituencies was larger than that of most studies which previously examined (and found) effects of facial appearance on election outcomes (Castelli et al, 2009;Chen et al, 2012Chen et al, , 2014Chen et al, , 2016Rule et al, 2010). Nonetheless, it might have been insufficient to detect regional differences in the effect of perceived trustworthiness.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…For example, preferences for dominant-looking partners are stronger when intergroup conflict is made salient (Hehman et al, 2015). In the political domain, cultural differences (Chen et al, 2012;Rule et al, 2010) and the political knowledge of voters (Berggren et al, 2017;Lenz & Lawson, 2011) have been shown to moderate how much voters rely on the facial appearance of candidates when making voting decisions. Previously mentioned work by Little and colleagues (2014; also demonstrates that leaders with different facial appearance are favored when an election is framed as taking place during a time of war or peace.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is some cultural variation as to which traits are most predictive of candidate success. For instance, perceived dominance predicted electoral success in the United States; however, perceived warmth or social competence served as a better predictor of candidate success in Japan and Taiwan (Chen, Jing, & Lee, 2012; Rule et al, 2010). Similarly, facial competence was a stronger predictor of candidates' electoral success in U.S. elections than in Korean elections (Na, Kim, Oh, Choi, & O'Toole, 2015).…”
Section: Casting a Ballotmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Additional research has documented cross‐cultural differences in the predictive nature of social inferences and their influence on candidates' electoral success. More specifically, competence judgments were less accurate at predicting electoral outcomes in Korean elections compared to American elections; whereas, social competence or one's ability to navigate interpersonal interactions was a stronger predictor of electoral outcomes in Taiwanese elections compared to American elections (Chen, Jing, & Lee, ; Na, Kim, Oh, Choi, & O'Toole, ).…”
Section: Casting a Ballotmentioning
confidence: 99%