Interspeech 2016 2016
DOI: 10.21437/interspeech.2016-1174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

i-Vector/HMM Based Text-Dependent Speaker Verification System for RedDots Challenge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 1 compares performance of relevance MAP, i-vector and JFA systems exploiting posteriors estimated using GMM-UBM. It can be seen that RMAP GMM achieves the best results among the modelbased SV systems, which is consistent with the results in [20]. Although in [14], the JFA GMM outperformed RMAP GMM and Ivec Table 3 shows the performance of the DTW SV systems (DTW-MFCC, DTW-post GMM , DTW-post DNN , DTW-onIvec GMM and DTW-onIvec DNN ) using different features.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table 1 compares performance of relevance MAP, i-vector and JFA systems exploiting posteriors estimated using GMM-UBM. It can be seen that RMAP GMM achieves the best results among the modelbased SV systems, which is consistent with the results in [20]. Although in [14], the JFA GMM outperformed RMAP GMM and Ivec Table 3 shows the performance of the DTW SV systems (DTW-MFCC, DTW-post GMM , DTW-post DNN , DTW-onIvec GMM and DTW-onIvec DNN ) using different features.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Since the relevance MAP approach has shown to provide good results on RedDots data [20], we consider this system as the baseline. First, we analyse the performance of the model-based SV approaches and then the DTW systems.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 8 compares the performance of all systems on RedDots dataset across all the conditions. We consider the MAP system (MAP GMM ) using GMM posterior as the baseline since it has shown to provide good performance in Zeinali et al (2016). The model-based SV systems perform worse on the RedDots database compared to RSR database (Dey et al, 2016a).…”
Section: Summary Of Experiments On Rsr Databasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These systems consider the feature dynamics of the words for identification. The most common modeling techniques for text-dependent speaker recognition are the Hidden Markov Models (HMM) [26] and Dynamic Time Warping (DTW) [27].…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MFCC is a filterbankbased approach designed to resemble the human auditory frequency perception. Other feature extraction methods are: delta-MFCC and delta-delta MFCC [32], linear predictive cepstral coefficients [33], perceptual linear prediction [34], coefficients cepstral mean and variance normalization [35], relative spectral transform filtering [36], feature warping [27], i-vectors and super-vectors [26].…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%