Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer-Aided Design 2012
DOI: 10.1145/2429384.2429457
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ICCAD-2012 CAD contest in fuzzy pattern matching for physical verification and benchmark suite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Table 4, it has normalized time is around 25-60 GPU h/mm 2 . Though our method is faster than optical verification method whose runtime is over 100 CPU h/mm 2 , it does not meet the of ICCAD2012 contest requirement (1-10 CPU h/mm 2 ) [8]. But, we can see the normalized runtime is proportional to the candidate region ratio (CR ratio).…”
Section: Detection Timementioning
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As shown in Table 4, it has normalized time is around 25-60 GPU h/mm 2 . Though our method is faster than optical verification method whose runtime is over 100 CPU h/mm 2 , it does not meet the of ICCAD2012 contest requirement (1-10 CPU h/mm 2 ) [8]. But, we can see the normalized runtime is proportional to the candidate region ratio (CR ratio).…”
Section: Detection Timementioning
confidence: 84%
“…We use Theano library [12] to train and test the CNN model. The proposed method was evaluated using industrial benchmarks titled IC-CAD2012 CAD dataset [8] described in Table 1. These 32 nm, 28 nm datasets has around 500-5000 clips whose size is around 5 µm square.…”
Section: Experiments Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, to achieve such accuracy, these hybrid models use multiple classifiers to check numerous potential problematic locations in the full layout. As mentioned in [9], such hybrid models may perform as much as 10-100 times slower than pattern-matching approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%