2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jglr.2014.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ice–water heat exchange during ice growth in Lake Baikal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

4
38
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
4
38
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, the modeled duration of the ice cover from October-November to May-June and the ∼ 1 m maximal ice thickness in Tibetan lakes agrees with the existing occasional field observations . The modeling results on the ice thickness may be assumed as more reliable than the ice breakup dates since ice growth is mainly governed by the ice-atmosphere heat budget (Aslamov et al, 2014;Leppäranta, 2015), which is well captured by the model. Another apparent error introduced by neglecting the under-ice radiative heating is that the mean heat content of the lake after ice-off is underestimated.…”
Section: Model Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the modeled duration of the ice cover from October-November to May-June and the ∼ 1 m maximal ice thickness in Tibetan lakes agrees with the existing occasional field observations . The modeling results on the ice thickness may be assumed as more reliable than the ice breakup dates since ice growth is mainly governed by the ice-atmosphere heat budget (Aslamov et al, 2014;Leppäranta, 2015), which is well captured by the model. Another apparent error introduced by neglecting the under-ice radiative heating is that the mean heat content of the lake after ice-off is underestimated.…”
Section: Model Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The heat flows in the ice and at the water-ice boundary were calculated using the ice thickness and the temperature of the ice and water. The solution of the inverse prob lem allowed determination of the coefficients of tem perature conductivity (vertical turbulent exchange) and estimation of the heat flow at the water-ice boundary [9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assumption of conductive, turbulence-free IL does not hold true in large lakes, where under-ice water circulation is strong enough to produce long-lasting shear turbulence at the ice base: Aslamov et al (2014Aslamov et al ( , 2017 reported a strong, up to an order of magnitude, variability in the ice-water heat flux in Lake Baikal at synoptic time scales of several days and referred it to variations of the large-scale surface currents, as a part of geostrophic circulation in Lake Baikal. Aslamov et al (2014) also 25 demonstrated that the resulting increase of the heat supply from water to the ice cover may cancel the ice growth and produce bulk melting even at atmospheric temperatures below the freezing point of water and upward heat flux at the ice surface. Any quantitative information on mixing conditions in the IL of small [as compared to the Rossby radius, see ice-covered lakes was missing up to date.…”
Section: Simmondsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the ice gets thinner, and the stratification in the IL gets stronger, the role of the wind-induced mixing in the upward heat transport from the CL to the ice base is expected to significantly increase. The effect of the shear mixing under ice on the vertical heat transport is 15 akin to the shear turbulence produced by the geostrophic circulation in ice-covered Lake Baikal (Aslamov et al, 2014(Aslamov et al, , 2017, with one important difference: a strong lake-wide circulation under ice takes place only in very large lakes, while production of shear turbulence by fluctuations of the ice cover is expected to develop in the majority of ice-covered lakes. Aslamov et al (2014Aslamov et al ( , 2017 reported heat fluxes of up to 50 W m −2 at the ice base of Lake Baikal, associated with ε = O(10 −8 ) W kg −1 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation