2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.simpat.2016.01.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ICN software tools: Survey and cross-comparison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To evaluate the accuracy of ModelGraft, we observe that simulators considered in [43] (ccnSim, NDNsim and Icarus, to mention a few) all yield consistent results: it follows that comparing ModelGraft against one of these simulators is sufficient to confirm ModelGraft validity. We thus select ccnSim -which was already shown to be among the most scalable ICN software tools [43]-and consider the largest scenario we can investigate via its event-driven engine.…”
Section: Modelgraft Validation: Very Large-scale Scenariomentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To evaluate the accuracy of ModelGraft, we observe that simulators considered in [43] (ccnSim, NDNsim and Icarus, to mention a few) all yield consistent results: it follows that comparing ModelGraft against one of these simulators is sufficient to confirm ModelGraft validity. We thus select ccnSim -which was already shown to be among the most scalable ICN software tools [43]-and consider the largest scenario we can investigate via its event-driven engine.…”
Section: Modelgraft Validation: Very Large-scale Scenariomentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Before delving into ModelGraft's details, we analyze it in the context of the full framework made available as open-source through the latest version of ccnSim [2] (although the methodology is portable to other simulators [43]), and we illustrate each of its building blocks at high level. As illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: Modelgraft Components and Workflowmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As far as network of caches are concerned, however, further approximations are required as an alternative approach to the computationally and algorithmically challenging characterization of the miss stream at any node in the network [22,25]. In arbitrary networks with shortest path [32] or more complex routing policies [33], it has been shown that inaccuracies can potentially cascade, with significant degradation of the accuracy with respect to simulation [34]. Finally, analytical approaches often assume stationary conditions, thus lacking in characterizing transient periods, although a model has been recently proposed only for a single cache [11].…”
Section: A Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess ModelGraft accuracy, we consider the largest scenario we can investigate via event-driven simulation gathered via ccnSim, already shown to be among the most scalable ICN software tools [34]. To stretch the boundaries reachable by event-driven simulation, we integrate the rejection inversion sampling -to the best of our knowledge, this represents the first performance evaluation of ICN networks with content catalogs in the order of billions.…”
Section: A Very-large Scale Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%