2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.08.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ICRF-edge and surface interactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although it does not pose a particular problem for the present 1D treatment which requires modest CPU time whatsoever, it both points to the fact there is a need for improvement of the numerical scheme when the wave-plasma interaction is to be modeled in more than a single dimension, and underlines the fact that the linearisation locally breaks down and the physics model needs to be upgraded to properly describe regions where that happens. The difficulty of solving the nonlinear set of equations relevant for high amplitude waves in low density regions close to metallic walls has already been noticed when adopting simpler models: Van Compernolle et al 34 experimented with implementing the sheath boundary condition due to Myra and D'Ippolito [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43] and was confronted with nonconvergence when the RF power density was too high.…”
Section: -15mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it does not pose a particular problem for the present 1D treatment which requires modest CPU time whatsoever, it both points to the fact there is a need for improvement of the numerical scheme when the wave-plasma interaction is to be modeled in more than a single dimension, and underlines the fact that the linearisation locally breaks down and the physics model needs to be upgraded to properly describe regions where that happens. The difficulty of solving the nonlinear set of equations relevant for high amplitude waves in low density regions close to metallic walls has already been noticed when adopting simpler models: Van Compernolle et al 34 experimented with implementing the sheath boundary condition due to Myra and D'Ippolito [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43] and was confronted with nonconvergence when the RF power density was too high.…”
Section: -15mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach is used rather than a reduction of the integrated E || on a family of magnetic field lines, because of the known complexity of the antenna-plasma-wall interactions [5,6]. Recently, the popular criterion of reduction of the integrated E || on the "long" field lines (the open field lines which pass in front of an antenna) has been questioned by the experimental observations in Tore Supra and in Alcator C-Mod.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the impurity content is affected by changes of transport plasma properties in the core, due to the heating and effects on the fast particle population [8], or in the scrape-off layer (SOL) by enhanced density convection driven mainly by the RF sheaths [9]. Impurity sources can be driven by 3 main mechanisms: a) sputtering by ions; b) thermal (evaporation, melting); c) sputtering by fast particles including charge exchange (CX) neutrals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Impurity sources can be driven by 3 main mechanisms: a) sputtering by ions; b) thermal (evaporation, melting); c) sputtering by fast particles including charge exchange (CX) neutrals. The sheath effects [9] are the most likely contributors to (a) and (b). In this respect, a special attention should be paid to the magnetic field line connections going from active ICRF antennas to high-Z PFCs, where the RF sheaths are driven by high antenna near fields, in particular parallel electric field E || .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%