ICT dynamics for gender inclusive intermediary education: minimum poverty and inequality thresholds in developing countries

Abstract

This study examines linkages between information and communication technology (ICT) dynamics, inequality and poverty in order to establish critical masses of poverty and inequality that should not be exceeded in order for ICT dynamics to promote gender inclusive education in 57 developing countries for the period 2012-2016. Poverty is measured with the poverty headcount ratio at national poverty lines (% of the population) while inequality is proxied by the Gini coefficient, the Atkinson index and the Palma ratio. The ICT dynamics are measured with 'internet access in school', 'virtual social network', 'personal computers' 'mobile phone penetration', 'internet penetration' and 'fixed broadband subscriptions'. The empirical evidence is based on interactive Generalized Method of Moments estimators from which thresholds are computed contingent on the validity of tested hypotheses. First, the Gini coefficient should not exceed 0.5618 in order for 'internet access in school' to positively affect inclusive education. Second, the poverty headcount ratio at national poverty lines (% of the population) should remain below 33.6842% in order for 'internet access in school' to favorably influence inclusive education. Third, the Palma ratio should not exceed 3.3766 in order for internet penetration to favorably affect inclusive education. Fourth, for personal computers to increase inclusive education, the Gini coefficient, Palma ratio and poverty headcount (% of the population) should not exceed 0.4781, 3.5294 and 17.7272, respectively. The study confirms the significant role technological deepening plays in advancing inclusive education by means of policies that reduce poverty and income inequality, with potentially wider applicability to other developing economies. The study has provided poverty and inequality levels that should not be exceeded in order for personal computers, internet penetration and 'internet access in school' to promote gender inclusive education.

The impact of information and communication technology (ICT) on carbon dioxide emissions: Evidence from heterogeneous ICT countries

“…The rapid reduction in ICT cost has facilitated enormous ICT investment, induced economic restructuring, and has become part and parcel of our daily lives 8 . It facilitates economic growth 10 , education 11,12 , foreign direct investment (FDI) 13 , financial development 14,15 , trade 16,17 , good governance 18,19 , and energy consumption [20][21][22] . As ICTs have been shown to drive economic growth, FDI, financial development, good governance, trade, and energy consumption, their environmental effect has also gained momentum among academicians and policymakers in recent times.…”

Tourism management for financial access in Sub-Saharan Africa: inequality thresholds

“…Such include, inter alia, studies on the influence of the global financial crisis on tourism development (Papatheodorou, Rosselló & Xiao, 2010;Khalid, Okafor & Shafiullah, 2020). Moreover, these findings complement a growing strand of literature on inequality levels that should not be exceeded for the establishment of favorable macroeconomic outcomes, inter alia: poverty and inequality thresholds that should not be exceeded in order for information and communication technology to positively influence gender intermediary education (Asongu, Amari, Jarboui & Mouakhar, 2021); inequality levels that should be kept in check in order for governance to promote gender economic participation (Asongu & Odhiambo, 2020d) and inequality levels that should not be reached in order for financial access to promote renewable energy consumption (Asongu & Odhiambo, 2021).…”

Factors that influence the intention of using an app in higher education

“…In the academic environment, technological advancements provide innovations to the teaching and learning process, with the reformulation of existing forms of knowledge transfer and the creation of new ones. In this context, they allow the existing knowledge inequalities to be studied and known for possible actions aimed at reducing barriers such as the geographic location of the student, which may hinder access to knowledge (Asongu, Amari, Jarboui, & Mouakhar, 2021).…”