2017
DOI: 10.1108/jices-11-2015-0038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ICTs in the context of disaster management, stakeholders, and implications

Abstract: Purpose This paper aims to focus on the role of information and communication technologies (ICTs) in preparation for and management of human and/or nature induced disasters. Design/methodology/approach Drawing from the phenomenal growth of ICTs, initiatives aimed at disaster management, stakeholder theory, prior research and the successful development and implementation of 9-1-1 (emergency telephone service of the USA), this paper explores ICTs in the context of human and/or nature induced disasters. Findi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Employees are also involved in assimilating the knowledge, and these requires both the search and shared processes that by using different tools to satisfy their work needs. As a result, the task complexity, along with the availability of different types of ICTs, calls for more extensive research on media multiplicity However, there is also a controversy about a role of ICT with regard to knowledge sharing, when authors stress and argued the potential benefits of ICTs in knowledge management (e.g Hachicha & Mezghani 2018;Ibrahim & Jebur 2019) as ICTs is also widely criticized for their limitation in facilitating knowledge process in organization (Madhavaram et al 2017). Apart from that, the advocates of ICT as a driver for knowledge management approach are also blamed because it only focuses on the explicit side of knowledge, while ignoring the tacit side (Khanam et al…”
Section: Ict Usagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Employees are also involved in assimilating the knowledge, and these requires both the search and shared processes that by using different tools to satisfy their work needs. As a result, the task complexity, along with the availability of different types of ICTs, calls for more extensive research on media multiplicity However, there is also a controversy about a role of ICT with regard to knowledge sharing, when authors stress and argued the potential benefits of ICTs in knowledge management (e.g Hachicha & Mezghani 2018;Ibrahim & Jebur 2019) as ICTs is also widely criticized for their limitation in facilitating knowledge process in organization (Madhavaram et al 2017). Apart from that, the advocates of ICT as a driver for knowledge management approach are also blamed because it only focuses on the explicit side of knowledge, while ignoring the tacit side (Khanam et al…”
Section: Ict Usagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kumagai et al ( 2019 ) To discuss a new IT (mobile phone-based service) for informing concerned authorities, family and friends about the well-being of an affected individual in emergency cases. Madhavaram et al ( 2017 ) To examine how emergency management organizations utilize ITs in their communication and coordination with other organizations in the emergency management network. Hu and Kapucu ( 2016 ) Analyse the role of ITs in humanitarian product and service supply after a disaster strikes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kumagai et al ( 2019 ) Emergency and disaster management. Madhavaram et al ( 2017 ), Hu and Kapucu ( 2016 ) Humanitarian Logistics. Khan et al ( 2019 ) Humanitarian relief operations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The data shows that some organizations continue to ignore AI, others are engaging in strategic AI programs; however, the management of these AI programs, many times are systems to observe the inputs and outputs, but not the internal workings (Garbuio & Lin, 2019). Also, other than initial insight, knowledge about directing AI application remains deficient (Lichtenthaler, 2020b;Shrestha, Ben-Menahem, & Krogh, 2019). Because AI has five maturity levels -activating, arranging, accomplishing, advancing, and amalgamating, these diverse levels give insight into organizations' challenges in managing AI programs and in profiting from such initiatives by fortifying their individual competitive positions (Overgoor et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%