2012
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/753/2/164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IDCS J1426.5+3508: DISCOVERY OF A MASSIVE, INFRARED-SELECTED GALAXY CLUSTER ATz= 1.75

Abstract: We report the discovery of an IR-selected massive galaxy cluster in the IRAC Distant Cluster Survey (IDCS). We present new data from the Hubble Space Telescope and the W. M. Keck Observatory that spectroscopically confirm IDCS J1426+3508 at z = 1.75. Moreover, the cluster is detected in archival Chandra data as an extended X-ray source, comprising 54 counts after the removal of point sources. We calculate an X-ray luminosity of L 0.5−2keV = (5.5 ± 1.2) × 10 44 ergs s −1 within r = 60 arcsec (∼ 1 Mpc diameter),… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
179
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(188 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
8
179
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar X-ray flux estimations were derived in galaxy proto-clusters at comparable high redshifts Papovich et al 2010;Gobat et al 2011), although, as for the MRC 0156-252 field, both these proto-clusters also host a number of X-ray AGN that made it challenging to estimate a reliable X-ray flux for the ICM. These estimations are still however ∼5−10 times fainter than the X-ray emission in the highest redshift confirmed X-ray selected galaxy clusters (e.g., z ∼ 1.6; Fassbender et al 2011) or mid-infrared selected galaxy clusters (z = 1.75; Stanford et al 2012) and (z ∼ 1.4−1.5; Brodwin et al 2011) which are most probably more advanced collapsed galaxy structures than the present proto-cluster.…”
Section: X-ray Extended Emission From the Icm?mentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Similar X-ray flux estimations were derived in galaxy proto-clusters at comparable high redshifts Papovich et al 2010;Gobat et al 2011), although, as for the MRC 0156-252 field, both these proto-clusters also host a number of X-ray AGN that made it challenging to estimate a reliable X-ray flux for the ICM. These estimations are still however ∼5−10 times fainter than the X-ray emission in the highest redshift confirmed X-ray selected galaxy clusters (e.g., z ∼ 1.6; Fassbender et al 2011) or mid-infrared selected galaxy clusters (z = 1.75; Stanford et al 2012) and (z ∼ 1.4−1.5; Brodwin et al 2011) which are most probably more advanced collapsed galaxy structures than the present proto-cluster.…”
Section: X-ray Extended Emission From the Icm?mentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Such a combination may open a new window for the study of cluster evolution, since the main searches carried out so far at similar redshifts have selection functions that are different to that of sub-mm surveys. X-ray and Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (SZ) effect surveys preferentially find massive and evolved structures, dominated by passive early type galaxies; the body of work on SZ-detected clusters is growing quickly (Planck Collaboration 2011dWilliamson et al 2011;Story et al 2011;Stanford et al 2012;Stalder et al 2012) and maybe in a near future a number of objects similar to those discussed here will be directly observed. Optical/nearIR cluster-finding algorithms, depending on what detection technique is used, can be biased to red evolved galaxies (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…In comparison with most other (proto-)cluster search techniques at these redshifts, e.g. the "IRAC selection" (e.g., Papovich et al 2010;Stanford et al 2012), targeted searches around radio galaxies (e.g., Venemans et al 2007;Chiaberge et al 2010;Wylezalek et al 2013), 3D mapping (with spectroscopic or photometric redshifts, e.g., Diener et al 2013;Scoville et al 2013;Chiang et al 2014;Mei et al 2014), or overdensities of optically red galaxies (e.g., Andreon et al 2009;Spitler et al 2012), the approach discussed in this work is likely, by definition, to favor the most evolved environments, thus allowing a better probe of the diversity of cluster progenitors at a crucial time for the formation of both clusters and their massive galaxies.…”
Section: Discussion and Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%