2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Idealisation of soil–structure system to determine inelastic seismic response of mid-rise building frames

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well known that the soil-structure interaction (SSI) plays an important and essential role in engineering design. Actually, the influence of SSI on the seismic response of structures has attracted the attention of a large number of engineers, and many research methods have been developed [38][39][40][41]. Research studies show that the rocking-induced nonlinearities are inevitable in soil and soil-foundation interface, which will cause permanent deformations and thus damage the building, particularly for the buildings adopting the shallow foundations, as it pointed out that the deep foundations (e.g., plie foundations) are the most common solution for the problems caused by the rocking-induced nonlinearities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that the soil-structure interaction (SSI) plays an important and essential role in engineering design. Actually, the influence of SSI on the seismic response of structures has attracted the attention of a large number of engineers, and many research methods have been developed [38][39][40][41]. Research studies show that the rocking-induced nonlinearities are inevitable in soil and soil-foundation interface, which will cause permanent deformations and thus damage the building, particularly for the buildings adopting the shallow foundations, as it pointed out that the deep foundations (e.g., plie foundations) are the most common solution for the problems caused by the rocking-induced nonlinearities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the importance of considering directionality effects of ground motions in 2D DSSI analyses has been highlighted. Two-dimensional models are widely used to perform DSSI analyses, since they are less computationally expensive than a three-dimensional (3D) one [53][54][55][56][57]. On the other hand, an important deficiency in DSSI analyses, usually performed, is that only the as-recorded components of ground motions are adopted, without considering other angles that could lead to a more severe structural response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In numerical studies performed by different authors (e.g., [9][10][11][12]), concerning the 2D versus 3D modeling of the SSI, the difference between the results for the 2D and 3D models were negligible where the artificial model was adopted for rigid soil [12]. A large amount of other research [13][14][15][16][17] has applied a similar analysis.…”
Section: Materials Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 95%