1999
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.76.1.72
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ideals in intimate relationships.

Abstract: This research examined lay relationship and partner ideals in romantic relationships from both a social-cognitive and an evolutionary perspective. Studies 1 and 2 revealed that the qualities of an ideal partner were represented by 3 factors (partner warmth-trustworthiness, vitality-attractiveness, and status-resources), whereas the qualities of an ideal relationship were represented by 2 factors (relationship intimacy-loyalty and passion). A confirmatory factor analysis in Study 3 replicated these factor struc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

45
882
4
22

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 519 publications
(953 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
45
882
4
22
Order By: Relevance
“…expectancies, of what they consider to be ideal in a romantic partner on factors such as responsiveness and intimacy potential, physical attractiveness, and status/resources Fletcher et al, 1999). Being willing to settle for lower quality mates would increase the pool of acceptable dating candidates and thus reduce the risk of ending up alone.…”
Section: Chapter 5 Settling For Less: Dating Standardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…expectancies, of what they consider to be ideal in a romantic partner on factors such as responsiveness and intimacy potential, physical attractiveness, and status/resources Fletcher et al, 1999). Being willing to settle for lower quality mates would increase the pool of acceptable dating candidates and thus reduce the risk of ending up alone.…”
Section: Chapter 5 Settling For Less: Dating Standardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, physical attractiveness may be a marker of genetic fitness and resistance to disease, making attractive people valuable mates, whereas social status affords one's mates and interaction partners social benefits that could not otherwise be obtained (e.g., Buss & Barnes, 1986;Thornhill & Grammer, 1999). Although evolutionary models have recently begun to include predictions about the value of CQs (e.g., Fletcher et al, 1999), the vast majority of evolutionary research on social value focuses on SCs. For example, social exchange and mate selection research indicates that SCs are widely valued in a potential romantic partner, across many diverse cultures (Buss et al, 1990;Buss & Barnes, 1986).…”
Section: Are Evolutionary Models Of Social Value Compatible With Thesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A maioria dos cônjuges deste estudo acreditava que o seu relacionamento tinha influência, tanto direta quanto indireta, nas relações mantidas com a criança, assim como também percebiam o filho, como interferindo no relacionamento marital, corroborando os achados de outros autores (Belsky, 1984;Deal et al, 1999;Kreppner, 2000) sobre a influência do casal no filho. Além disso, Braz et al (2005) observaram uma maior proporção de casais de classe média satisfeitos com seus relacionamentos maritais em comparação aos de classe mais baixa, indo ao encontro de resultados previamente publicados (Fletcher et al, 1999;Gottman, 1998).…”
Section: Key-wordsunclassified