2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.mbs.2006.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifiability of the joint distribution of age and tumor size at detection in the presence of screening

Abstract: In recent years, a stochastic model of cancer development and detection allowing for arbitrary screening schedules has been developed and applied to analysis of screening trials and populationbased cancer incidence and mortality data. The model is entirely mechanistic, builds on a minimal set of biologically plausible assumptions, and yields the joint distribution of tumor size and age of a patient at the time of diagnosis. Whether or not parameters of the model can be estimated from data generated by cohort s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Heidenreich and colleagues, and Hanin and Yakovlev30 have found that there is a fundamental identifiability problem in the TSCE model which prohibits the estimation of the values of the fundamental model parameters directly from incidence or mortality data alone: the first and second mutation rates (α 1 and α 2 ); and the birth and death rates of intermediate cells (b and d). Hence, the parameter combinations A, B and C are estimated instead as functions of the four fundamental parameters, and also used in our version of the software.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heidenreich and colleagues, and Hanin and Yakovlev30 have found that there is a fundamental identifiability problem in the TSCE model which prohibits the estimation of the values of the fundamental model parameters directly from incidence or mortality data alone: the first and second mutation rates (α 1 and α 2 ); and the birth and death rates of intermediate cells (b and d). Hence, the parameter combinations A, B and C are estimated instead as functions of the four fundamental parameters, and also used in our version of the software.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We proceed from the following two biologically natural assumptions; see also . Assumption Random variables W 0 and T are independent.…”
Section: Formula For the Screening Efficiency Functionalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis of records of more than 69,400 patients, however, demonstrates that this effect is very weak . For a more extensive discussion of the dependence between RVs W 0 and T , see . Assumption For every t ≥ 0, RVs W 1 and W 0 are conditionally independent given T = t . This is justified by thinking of spontaneous and screening‐based detection as unrelated random processes that start at the time of tumor onset and compete for tumor discovery.…”
Section: Formula For the Screening Efficiency Functionalmentioning
confidence: 99%