2006
DOI: 10.1157/13091479
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identificación de nueva población de riesgo neonatal con curvas de crecimiento intrauterino peruanas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As time passed, however, new weight standards related to gestational age (in weeks) were proposed by Latin American authors such as Alarcón, [14] González, [15] Pazcusso,[16] Parra, [17] and Urquía, [18] who presented evidence that P10 fi gures were higher than those found by Battaglia and Lubchenco. [13] After 1995, when WHO established criteria to set these standards, [1] numerous studies were conducted in Latin America with countryspecifi c populations; Parra, [17] Ticona, [19,20] and more recently, Villamonte [21] in Peru; Montoya in Colombia; [22]; San Pedro in Argentina; [23] and Lagos and Juez in Chile. [24][25][26] Intercountry differences observed in their results may be due, among other factors, to variations in features of the population studied, varying demographic and environmental factors, sample size and varying inclusion/exclusion criteria applied by the researchers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As time passed, however, new weight standards related to gestational age (in weeks) were proposed by Latin American authors such as Alarcón, [14] González, [15] Pazcusso,[16] Parra, [17] and Urquía, [18] who presented evidence that P10 fi gures were higher than those found by Battaglia and Lubchenco. [13] After 1995, when WHO established criteria to set these standards, [1] numerous studies were conducted in Latin America with countryspecifi c populations; Parra, [17] Ticona, [19,20] and more recently, Villamonte [21] in Peru; Montoya in Colombia; [22]; San Pedro in Argentina; [23] and Lagos and Juez in Chile. [24][25][26] Intercountry differences observed in their results may be due, among other factors, to variations in features of the population studied, varying demographic and environmental factors, sample size and varying inclusion/exclusion criteria applied by the researchers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%