cThe emerging pathogens Candida palmioleophila, Candida fermentati, and Debaryomyces nepalensis are often misidentified as Candida guilliermondii or Candida famata in the clinical laboratory. Due to the significant differences in antifungal susceptibilities and epidemiologies among these closely related species, a lot of studies have focused on the identification of these emerging yeast species in clinical specimens. Nevertheless, limited tools are currently available for their discrimination. Here, two new molecular approaches were established to distinguish these closely related species. The first approach differentiates these species by use of restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of partial internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) and large subunit ribosomal DNA with the enzymes BsaHI and XbaI in a double digestion. The second method involves a multiplex PCR based on the intron size differences of RPL18, a gene coding for a protein component of the large (60S) ribosomal subunit, and speciesspecific amplification. These two methods worked well in differentiation of these closely related yeast species and have the potential to serve as effective molecular tools suitable for laboratory diagnoses and epidemiological studies. N ewly emerging species that are closely related to the common Candida species pose a challenge to conventional methods performed in the clinical laboratory (1-4). These closely related species actually belong to diverse species complexes, as revealed by sequence and phylogenetic analyses. Recent advances in molecular techniques have allowed differentiation of these species complexes, such as the Candida albicans complex composed of C. albicans, Candida dubliniensis, Candida africana, and Candida stellatoidea type I, the Candida parapsilosis complex composed of C. parapsilosis, Candida orthopsilosis, Candida metapsilosis, and Lodderomyces elongisporus, and the Candida glabrata complex composed of C. glabrata, Candida nivariensis, and Candida bracarensis (1,(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17).Candida guilliermondii (the anamorph of Pichia guilliermondii), a species with decreased susceptibility to fluconazole and echinocandins, was reported as a common cause of candidiasis and sometimes even candidemia (18-21). Candida fermentati (the anamorph of Pichia caribbica), an emerging species that is very closely related to C. guilliermondii, has often been misidentified as C. guilliermondii using routine identification methods (22-26). Because of lower susceptibility to triazoles, Candida palmioleophila, which is often misidentified as Candida famata (the anamorph of Debaryomyces hansenii) or C. guilliermondii, has been emphasized in recent studies (24,25,27). Additionally, Debaryomyces nepalensis and Debaryomyces fabryi, two species that are closely related to C. famata, have been isolated from clinical samples, including blood (22,28,29), and also are potential pathogens. The above-mentioned yeast species are likely to be confused with one another by conventional identification...