2002
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2002.1897
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification and Characterization of Pedogeomorphological Processes on a Hillslope

Abstract: This study aims to identify process‐response relationships between pedogeomorphological processes and the spatial distribution of soil properties on a hillslope. Thirty‐two physical and chemical attributes of 502 soil samples collected from 64 soil profiles on a hillslope in Somerset, UK, were analyzed using an ordination technique. Five factors explaining 80% of the total variation were first identified. Each factor was then regressed with terrain attributes to examine the influence of hillslope geomorphometr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
0
5

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
39
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the SE 9 landscape, situated at a lower elevation than the NE 8 landscape, presented greater soil profile development and higher SPIs than the NE 8 landscape. Park and Burt (2002) mentioned that topographic features on soil horizon distribution operate differently among landscapes. The change from grassland to agricultural land, and variations in agricultural management, can have a permanent impact on water budget, infiltration capacity, and leaching (Brooks et al 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the SE 9 landscape, situated at a lower elevation than the NE 8 landscape, presented greater soil profile development and higher SPIs than the NE 8 landscape. Park and Burt (2002) mentioned that topographic features on soil horizon distribution operate differently among landscapes. The change from grassland to agricultural land, and variations in agricultural management, can have a permanent impact on water budget, infiltration capacity, and leaching (Brooks et al 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have examined topographic features to describe and predict soil properties and/or water movement within hummocky landscapes (Pennock et al 1987;MacMillan and Pettapiece 2000;Conly and Van Der Kamp 2001;Florinsky et al 2002;Park and Burt 2002). However, the use of these models on a local scale has not been explored.…”
Section: Mots Clésmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various studies investigated relationships between soil chemical properties and landscape features using advances in soil-landscape modeling (e.g., Moore et al, 1993;Gessler et al, 1995;Florinsky et al, 2002;Park and Burt, 2002;Baxter and Oliver, 2005;Henderson et al, 2005), but few dealt with the tropics (e.g., Holmes et al, 2005). Soil-landscape modeling helps to predict the spatial patterns of soil properties and to regionalize point observations by quantifying the relationship between environmental variables and soil properties of interest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assim, a falta de significado pedológico das CP inicialmente geradas fica parcialmente contornada, pois a cada uma pode-se associar as variáveis originais (atributos do terreno). Abordagem similar, na busca por um sentido pedológico para as CP utilizadas, foi adotada por Park & Burt (2002). Em estudo que relacionou processos de formação e atributos de terreno, os autores associaram cinco CP a fatores pedogeomorfológicos, os quais foram a podzolização, dinâmica de nutrientes, lixiviação de Mn, intemperização e acidificação do solo.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified