1981
DOI: 10.1094/phyto-71-1037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification and Nutritional Differentiation of the Erwinia Sugar Beet Pathogen from Members ofErwinia carotovoraandErwinia chrysanthemi

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
47
0
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
47
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several attempts have been made to clarify the taxonomic structure of Erwinia; these have been based on different methodologies, such as deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)-DNA hybridization (2, &lo, 29,32,47), comparative phenotypic studies (17,(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)27,30,45,67), serological studies (11,19,59,60,72), gel electrophoresis of proteins (43,44,46,69), and characterization of the respiratory quinones and enzymes of fumarate metabolism (32). The problems related to the taxonomy of Erwinia have been discussed extensively (5 , 41, 45, 63, 65).…”
Section: (58)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several attempts have been made to clarify the taxonomic structure of Erwinia; these have been based on different methodologies, such as deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)-DNA hybridization (2, &lo, 29,32,47), comparative phenotypic studies (17,(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)27,30,45,67), serological studies (11,19,59,60,72), gel electrophoresis of proteins (43,44,46,69), and characterization of the respiratory quinones and enzymes of fumarate metabolism (32). The problems related to the taxonomy of Erwinia have been discussed extensively (5 , 41, 45, 63, 65).…”
Section: (58)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…atrosepticum, denominada P. carotovorum subsp. betavasculorum (Thomson et al, 1981), e com conteĂșdo de G+C intermediĂĄria entre P. carotovorum subsp. carotovorum e P. chrysanthemi, Ă© uma indicação de que as formas intermediĂĄrias possuem uma importĂąncia epidemiolĂłgica significativa e podem ser encontradas com maior freqĂŒĂȘncia a medida que levantamentos mais amplos sejam efetuados.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…They belonged to one of three species, namely Erwinia cacticida, Erwinia carotovora and Erwinia chrysanthemi (Young et al 1996). Erwinia carotovora was further classified into the subspecies atroseptica (Lelliott & Dickey 1984), betavasculorum (Thomson et al 1981), odorifera (Gallois et al 1992) and wasabiae (Goto & Matsumoto 1987) according to pathogenecity and host-plant specificity. The genus Erwinia was subsequently divided into three phylogenic groups, and members of clade II, including the five Erwinia carotovora subspecies, E. cacticida, E. chrysanthemi and E. cypripedii, were united in the genus Pectobacterium (Hauben et al 1998), which was first described by Waldee (1945).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%