2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10681-019-2480-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification and physical mapping of QTLs associated with flowering time in Brassica napus L.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of the challenges in the use of both population-specific and consensus genetic maps for QTL detection in polyploid species, such as wheat, include (1) difficulty in establishing linkage groups and determining correct markers orders, (2) an increase in the number of linkage groups as compared with the number of chromosomes, which could be 2-3-fold [38], (3) collinearity among multiple markers due to relatively small population sizes that result to very small inter-marker interval (<1 cM) between multiple adjacent markers, and (4) the lack of consistent relationship between genetic and physical maps, which makes direct comparisons of QTL discovery results across multiple populations unreliable [39]. Although some studies have published physical maps of QTL associated with diverse traits [39][40][41][42][43][44], the method has not yet been widely used due to a lack of reliable physical maps. Recently, the International Wheat Genome Sequencing Consortium (IWGSC) has released the latest version of the bread wheat reference genome sequence (RefSeq v2.0) and physical map (http://wheat-urgi.versailles.inra.fr/; accessed on 22 April 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the challenges in the use of both population-specific and consensus genetic maps for QTL detection in polyploid species, such as wheat, include (1) difficulty in establishing linkage groups and determining correct markers orders, (2) an increase in the number of linkage groups as compared with the number of chromosomes, which could be 2-3-fold [38], (3) collinearity among multiple markers due to relatively small population sizes that result to very small inter-marker interval (<1 cM) between multiple adjacent markers, and (4) the lack of consistent relationship between genetic and physical maps, which makes direct comparisons of QTL discovery results across multiple populations unreliable [39]. Although some studies have published physical maps of QTL associated with diverse traits [39][40][41][42][43][44], the method has not yet been widely used due to a lack of reliable physical maps. Recently, the International Wheat Genome Sequencing Consortium (IWGSC) has released the latest version of the bread wheat reference genome sequence (RefSeq v2.0) and physical map (http://wheat-urgi.versailles.inra.fr/; accessed on 22 April 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The genotypes of this population and two parents were analyzed using simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers and the Illumina (San Diego, CA, USA) Brassica 60 K Infinium array by DNA Landmarks (Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu, QC, Canada) in a previous study [ 75 ]. A high-density single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) linkage map incorporating 2755 bins (involving 11,458 SNPs) and 57 SSRs, covering 2027.53 cM with an average marker interval of 0.72 cM was developed for QTL mapping of the apetalous trait [ 75 , 76 ], seed fatty acid composition [ 77 ], flowering time [ 78 ], and stem mechanical strength [ 79 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genetic and physical maps have shown low to moderate correlations, which makes direct comparisons of mapping results from independent studies unreliable (Dossa, 2016;Semagn et al, 2021b). Some studies have published physical maps of QTLs associated with diverse traits (Dossa, 2016;Lecouls et al, 2002;Okada et al, 2019; Crop Science Schönhals et al, 2017;Wang et al, 2005;Yu et al, 2019), but most of those studies focused on a specific chromosome (but not the whole genome) and older versions of the reference sequences. Nearly all studies that used array-based genotyping platforms, such as the Wheat 90K SNP array are based on consensus linkage maps that are often erroneous.…”
Section: Core Ideasmentioning
confidence: 99%