2020
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.0c03211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification and Quantification of Microplastics in Potable Water and Their Sources within Water Treatment Works in England and Wales

Abstract: Microplastics were characterized in eight water treatment works (WTWs) in England and Wales (UK). Sources included river water, groundwater, and an upland reservoir. Water treatment varied from disinfection, filtration, sedimentation, and activated carbon techniques. At each WTW, five repeat samples of raw and potable water and two repeat sludge samples were taken over 5 months. Microplastics in water were captured on 10 μm filters and nonplastic materials digested in the laboratory. Microplastics ≥25 μm were … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
56
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
56
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In total, 14 procedural blanks were prepared during this study. Similar to other opuses, the limit of detection (LOD) for each sample type was calculated from the blanks as follows [23][24][25]:…”
Section: Blank Samples and Lodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In total, 14 procedural blanks were prepared during this study. Similar to other opuses, the limit of detection (LOD) for each sample type was calculated from the blanks as follows [23][24][25]:…”
Section: Blank Samples and Lodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although they both refer to reducing the variations in the methodology, harmonization is less stringent and allows some variation, whereas standardization implies complete absence of variations. Standardization cannot be achieved throughout all aspects of scientific experimental protocols, but best practices for analytical procedures and quality assurance and control tools can be set as the minimum standard for designing, executing, and reporting experiments (Johnson et al 2020). The lack of such harmonized methods hinders the acquisition of reliable and reproducible data.…”
Section: Environmental Health Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the end of the last digestion cycle and after filtration through a 38 μm sieve, samples were rinsed three times with ZnCl 2 instead of ultrapure water, to prevent a change in density. Samples were first poured into small beakers and then into 100 ml glass separation funnels previously rinsed three times with ZnCl 2 , kept closed with lids and left to settle for a minimum of 15 h, after which 2/3 of the solution was drained out through the valve [81]. The remaining solution was poured into a sieve stack with a 100 μm sieve on top and a 38 μm sieve below to discard the fraction larger than 100 μm.…”
Section: Density Separation and Filtrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…siMPle is freely available for download together with a reference database (https://simple-plastics.eu/) [84]. In this study, the AAU pipeline has been used for image analysis, and it is based on a score threshold system [78,81,82,84,87]. This software is used to compare the infrared spectra collected from the μFT-IR against the spectra of the reference database for automated analysis.…”
Section: μFt-ir Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation