2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-22500-5_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification in E-Participation: Between Quality of Identification Data and Participation Threshold

Abstract: Abstract. E-Participation projects have to consider a low participation threshold while maintaining security and data quality standards. While users often perceive complex regulations and logins as hurdles for participation, providers of solutions want to avoid misuse and in some cases have identified the participants uniquely. Not all levels of e-participation require the same quality of identification and authentication to produce reliable outcomes. Based on the first results of an Austrian e-participation p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These variables explain the connection between the primary variables, behavioural intentions, and user behaviour (Venkatesh et al, 2003). Researchers commonly employ theoretical frameworks to clarify and forecast individuals' tendencies towards adopting and utilising technology [48,49].…”
Section: Unified Theory Of Acceptance and Use Of Technology (Utaut)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These variables explain the connection between the primary variables, behavioural intentions, and user behaviour (Venkatesh et al, 2003). Researchers commonly employ theoretical frameworks to clarify and forecast individuals' tendencies towards adopting and utilising technology [48,49].…”
Section: Unified Theory Of Acceptance and Use Of Technology (Utaut)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…People's interests will be considered when making policy decisions if the government is better prepared to ask, collect, and consider the opinions of its residents. E-participation also encompasses digital technology, which may inspire people to participate in online activities once they can [11] [12]. Online discussion groups, electronic voting, virtual communities and web forums, decisionmaking exercises, social networking, and tools for general recommendation are all examples of digital-enabled strategies for e-participation.…”
Section: Introduction a Background Of The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5] Previous research of the authors study group has utilized this classification for a model of tool assessment, specifically for investigating which e-ID is appropriate on which particular level of e-participation, with special regard to voting and rating mechanisms, participation threshold and security. [5,8] This paper focuses on the acceptance of users and potential stakeholders when it comes to choosing appropriate means of identification (e-IDs) for authentication in different e-participation levels. The authors assess potential areas of application from a stakeholder perspective and the acceptance of tools from users' points of views (micro-level or project perspective, see the evaluation framework below).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%