2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2021.111072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of a bio-signature for barley resistance against Pyrenophora teres infection based on physiological, molecular and sensor-based phenotyping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
3
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results showed that compared to the control (non-inoculated plants), CAT, POD, and SOD activities increased more after C. gloeosporioides infection in the disease-resistant lines than in the susceptible lines. These results are consistent with the previous studies ( Li et al., 2018 ; Pandey et al., 2021 ). There are two potential possibilities for disease-resistant lines to have higher conserved enzyme activities than disease-susceptible lines.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Our results showed that compared to the control (non-inoculated plants), CAT, POD, and SOD activities increased more after C. gloeosporioides infection in the disease-resistant lines than in the susceptible lines. These results are consistent with the previous studies ( Li et al., 2018 ; Pandey et al., 2021 ). There are two potential possibilities for disease-resistant lines to have higher conserved enzyme activities than disease-susceptible lines.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…"Antonella", which is the most resistant to PTT, had the lowest SOD activity in all isolates. However, this coincides with the findings that reported a positive association between the presence of ROS and disease resistance [12,55,56].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The previous results are in contradiction with those of Lightfoot et al [12], who detected higher SOD activity in resistant barley genotypes, and smaller symptoms were detected in transgenic HcCSD1 knock-down lines. However, when the expression pattern of SOD2 gene was investigated, it was found that except for clear activation of expression at 8 h after infection measured in the resistant genotype, the expression pattern fluctuated more in the sensitive ones, and there was a second expression peak at 120 h in resistance one after a decline at 48 h [56].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Automated phenotyping with the help of UAVs or robotics can increase the number of measuring times compared with manual handling by traditional scoring based on visual inspection. Some pathogen infections only become visible by the naked eye at later stages of plant disease development, but can instead be captured pre-symptomatically by multispectral, hyperspectral, multicolour fluorescence, and PAM chlorophyll fluorescence imaging ( Hupp et al , 2019 ; Pandey et al , 2021 ). In spite of these emerging possibilities, there are so far relatively few studies in agricultural fields of disease progression using proximal or remote sensing in Nordic conditions, and a functional phenomics approach has not been taken.…”
Section: Plant Health and Crop Management In Nordic Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Centre for Plant Research in Controlled Climate (SKP), in Ås, South Norway, a joint unit between the NMBU (Norwegian University of Life Sciences) and NIBIO, also offers a climate-controlled facility for research purposes. Automated HTP in the PhenoLab at the University of Copenhagen allows assessment of the impact of various abiotic environmental factors including expected future CO 2 levels on plant responses by multireflectance, fluorescence, and thermography ( Pandey et al , 2021 ). Finally, the Umeå Plant Science Centre hosts a unique conveyor belt-driven tree phenotyping platform which automatically monitors and records growth parameters.…”
Section: Functional Phenomics and Phenotyping Facilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%