2011
DOI: 10.1124/jpet.110.178392
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of a High-Affinity Ligand That Exhibits Complete Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Antagonism

Abstract: The biological functions of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) can be delineated into dioxin response element (DRE)-dependent or -independent activities. Ligands exhibiting either full or partial agonist activity, e.g., 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin and ␣-naphthoflavone, have been demonstrated to potentiate both DRE-dependent and -independent AHR function. In contrast, the recently identified selective AHR modulators (SAhRMs), e.g., 1-allyl-3-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)-7-(trifluoromethyl)-1H-indazole (SGA360… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
87
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1, arrows). The structures of the putative antagonist compounds and, for comparison, those of other previously described AHR antagonists, CH223191 (Kim et al, 2006), StemRegenin (SR1) (Boitano et al, 2010), GNF351 (Smith et al, 2011), and 6, 29,49trimethoxyflavone (Zhao et al, 2010) are provided in Fig. 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1, arrows). The structures of the putative antagonist compounds and, for comparison, those of other previously described AHR antagonists, CH223191 (Kim et al, 2006), StemRegenin (SR1) (Boitano et al, 2010), GNF351 (Smith et al, 2011), and 6, 29,49trimethoxyflavone (Zhao et al, 2010) are provided in Fig. 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include CH223191 (Kim et al, 2006), 6,29,49-trimethoxyflavone (TMF) (Murray IA et al, 2009), SR1 (Boitano et al, 2010), and GNF351 (Smith et al, 2011). Identification of additional AHR antagonists, such as CB7993113, is important because each antagonist appears to exhibit unique properties in terms of affinity for AHRs from different species, "ligand selectivity," or ability to block AHR response elementdependent signaling (Smith et al, 2011). For example, SR1 is a potent antagonist of the human AHR but has little or no effect on ligand binding to murine AHR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the highaffinity exogenous substances are several planar and lipophilic PHAHs of the dioxin, dibenzofuran, biphenyl, and azoxybenzene types sharing structural properties with the highly toxic TCDD (Nguyen and Bradfield, 2008 (Till et al, 1999;Nguyen and Bradfield, 2008). The bacterial pigment 1-hydroxyphenazine and three pharmacological agents, StemRegenin 1 and GNF351 [N-(2-(3H-indol-3-yl)ethyl)-9-isopropyl-2-(5-methyl-3-pyridyl)-7H-purin-6-amine] (two potent AhR antagonists), as well as VAF347 [(4-(3-chloro-phenyl)-pyrimidin-2-yl)-(4-trifluoromethyl-phenyl)-amine], have also been observed to be high-affinity ligands (Lawrence et al, 2008;Boitano et al, 2010;Smith et al, 2011;MouraAlves et al, 2014). Many of these exogenous compounds probably bear structural similarities to physiologic ligand(s).…”
Section: The Realm Of Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Ligands: Agonists mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3E). To confirm that the repressive action of AHR agonists occurs specifically through AHR, we attempted to suppress agonist-mediated activity by pretreating cells (16). Surprisingly, GNF351 was unable to antagonize 100 nM ICZ-mediated AHR activity (Fig.…”
Section: Ligand-activated Ahr Attenuates Ppar␣- Chrebp- and Er Strementioning
confidence: 99%