2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10040-007-0219-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of a hydrodynamic threshold in karst rocks from the Biscayne Aquifer, south Florida, USA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This enabled the determination of the pore size affected by the vacuum using the following equations as suggested by DiFrenna et al . [] which investigated a similar limestone from Key Largo, Florida. First, the change of pressure in the vacuum chamber (Δp) was calculated from the equation: Δp=Δhpg where Δh is the change in head, ρ is the density of water (1000 kg m 3 ), and g is the acceleration due to gravity (9.8 m s −2 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This enabled the determination of the pore size affected by the vacuum using the following equations as suggested by DiFrenna et al . [] which investigated a similar limestone from Key Largo, Florida. First, the change of pressure in the vacuum chamber (Δp) was calculated from the equation: Δp=Δhpg where Δh is the change in head, ρ is the density of water (1000 kg m 3 ), and g is the acceleration due to gravity (9.8 m s −2 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the formation factor as calculated by Tucker (2013), the porosity of the Miami oolite used in modeling is equal to approximately 33%, well within the bounds of previous estimates (Robinson, 1967;DiFrenna et al, 2008). Underestimations of the measured salinity at a well by the ERT-estimated value indicate a location where bedrock porosity is lower than this average, while overestimations indicate locations of higher bedrock porosity.…”
Section: Effects Of Bedrock Porosity On Ert-estimation Of Groundwatersupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Beginning on Big Pine Key and trending to the southwest, the Miami Limestone outcrops over the underlying Key Largo Limestone and contacts are separated by subaerial exposures . While both formations are moderately to highly porous (average porosity of 20 to 40%) (Robinson, 1967;DiFrenna et al, 2008), the Key Largo Limestone is more permeable than the Miami Limestone as a result of the greater development of secondary porosity . Longer periods of meteoric diagenesis of the underlying Key Largo Limestone are responsible for the increase in secondary porosity and interconnected pore spaces (Vacher et al, 1992).…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using glass spheres, Schneebeli [1955] found that flow became turbulent when Re ranged from 5 to 60. Within limestone rocks from the Florida Keys, DiFrenna et al [2008] found non‐Darcian flow with effective porosity equal to about 33% and hydraulic conductivity equal to about 10 m d −1 . When flow transitions to turbulent, some of the energy that drives the flow is lost to movement of water in unsteady eddies, and specific discharge no longer increases as rapidly as the head gradient increases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%