2017
DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2017.6576
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of a missense HOXD13 mutation in a Chinese family with syndactyly type I-c using exome sequencing

Abstract: Syndactyly is one of the most common hereditary limb malformations, and is characterized by the fusion of specific fingers and/or toes. Syndactyly type I‑c is associated with bilateral cutaneous or bony webbing of the third and fourth fingers and occasionally of the third to fifth fingers, with normal feet. The aim of the present study was to identify the genetic basis of syndactyly type I‑c in four generations of a Chinese Han family by exome sequencing. Exome sequencing was conducted in the proband of the fa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Filtrations of all identified variations were performed based on following references: mean coverage ≥100, mutation ratio ≥10, absence of mutation in 1000 Genomes Project and non‐synonymous mutations . Direct Sanger sequencing confirmed the potential pathogenic variant via an ABI3500 sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) . PCR amplification and Sanger sequencing primer sequences are as follows: 5′‐CCTTGTGTTTGTGGTGGAGC‐3′ and 5′‐CCTCTTACCTGTGCCTGTGA‐3′.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Filtrations of all identified variations were performed based on following references: mean coverage ≥100, mutation ratio ≥10, absence of mutation in 1000 Genomes Project and non‐synonymous mutations . Direct Sanger sequencing confirmed the potential pathogenic variant via an ABI3500 sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) . PCR amplification and Sanger sequencing primer sequences are as follows: 5′‐CCTTGTGTTTGTGGTGGAGC‐3′ and 5′‐CCTCTTACCTGTGCCTGTGA‐3′.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13,14 Direct Sanger sequencing confirmed the potential pathogenic variant via an ABI3500 sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). [15][16][17] PCR amplification and Sanger sequencing primer sequences are as follows: 5′-CCTTGTGTTTGTGGTGGAGC-3′ and 5′-CCTCTTACCTGT GCCTGTGA-3′.…”
Section: Variant Analysis and Direct Sanger Sequencingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, aberrant polyalanine expansion in the polyalanine tract of the HOXD13 gene was reported in numerous unrelated families with classical phenotypes of SPD (Kjaer et al 2005;Horsnell et al 2006;Gong et al 2011;Xin et al 2012), and it leads to misfolding, degradation or cytoplasmic aggregation of those mutant products through dominant negative effect (Brison et al 2014). Loss-offunction mutations in the homeodomain (in exon 2 of HOXD13) were usually found in the patients with minor variants and unusual phenotypes of SPD (Kan et al 2003;Kurban et al 2011;Dai et al 2014;Deng et al 2017). Functional haploinsufficiency caused by truncating mutations in HOXD13 is almost the most plausible mechanism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The molecular mechanism of SPD is still ambiguous and difficult to be explored. Typical SPD is generally caused by aberrant expansions of a 15-residue polyalanine tract in homeobox D13 (HOXD13), while the patients with minor variants and unusual phenotypes are provoked by minor mutations (small deletions/insertions, nonsense and missense mutations) in the homeodomain of HOXD13 (Kurban et al 2011;Xin et al 2012;Deng et al 2017). The other genes that are associated with SPD have also been reported (Johnston and Kirby 1955;Cenani and Lenz 1967;Debeer et al 2002;Li et al 2010;Wieczorek et al 2010;Dimitrov et al 2010), which makes the relationship between the phenotypes and genotypes of SPD much intricate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Đối với bệnh dính ngón chân tay dạng I-c, cho đến nay mới chỉ có một đột biến trên gen HOXD13 c.917G > A (p.R306Q) được công bố phát hiện trên một phả hệ gia đình người Trung Quốc gồm 5 thành viên bị dính ngón dạng này [12]. Ngoài ra, một số gen cũng được phát hiện ở một vài gia đình có bệnh nhân dính ngón thuộc các dạng khác như gen FBLN1 liên quan đến dính ngón dạng II [13], gen LMBR1 liên quan đến dạng IV [14], hay gen LRP4 liên quan đến dạng VII [15].…”
Section: Thảo Luận Và Kết Luậnunclassified