1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf00222026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of a set of RFLP probes for subspecies differentiation in Oryza sativa L.

Abstract: Sixty-eight indica-japonica tester-differentiating RFLP probes were tested in seven indica and seven japonica varieties of rice (Oryza sativa L.) with four enzyme digestions (EcoRI, EcoRV, HindIII and DraI). Twenty-one DNA clones were isolated as indica-japonica subspecies-differentiating probes. A set of 13 probes was established as core probes for subspecies differentiation and a pooled blotting analysis was carried out to facilitate the application of RFLP in rice genetics and breeding practice. A dendrogra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it adopts so many quantitative traits and is easy to be influenced by subjective experiences. Along with the rapid development of molecular marker technology since 1980, it has been used widely in rice classification (Qian et al, 1995;Qi et al, 2001;Chen et al, 2002;Wang et al, 2006) and phylogeny Nonnatus et al, 2001;Sun et al, 2001;Cai et al, 2006), which is simple, convenient, objective, with no influence by environments. However, the molecular marker method has not become an independent classification system, which depends on the conventional morphological marker method to make verification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it adopts so many quantitative traits and is easy to be influenced by subjective experiences. Along with the rapid development of molecular marker technology since 1980, it has been used widely in rice classification (Qian et al, 1995;Qi et al, 2001;Chen et al, 2002;Wang et al, 2006) and phylogeny Nonnatus et al, 2001;Sun et al, 2001;Cai et al, 2006), which is simple, convenient, objective, with no influence by environments. However, the molecular marker method has not become an independent classification system, which depends on the conventional morphological marker method to make verification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total DNA extraction, restriction endonuclease digestion, electrophoresis, Southern blotting, hybridization and autoradiography were carried out following the methods described previously by Zheng et al (1990) and Lu and Zheng (1992). Thirty rice clones were selected based on our previous work on phylogenetic analysis of the cultivated O. sativa (Zheng et al 1994;Qian et al 1995), which are distributed over different chromosomes of the cultivated rice (see Table 2). Most clones (RG clones) are random genomic clones from Cornell University.…”
Section: Dna Extraction and Rflp Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These cultivars were characterized by RFLP markers. RFLP markers are useful for the classification of rice and several individual RFLP markers can be used to classify rices into indica and japonica, ecogeographical races (Zheng et al, 1994;Qian et al, 1995;Li et al, 1998). The RFLP markers diagnostic for the cultivar groups were screened from the markers on the rice RFLP genetic linkage map (Kurata et al, 1994), using a core collection of 130 rice cultivars whose cultivar groups had been identified (data are not shown).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%