1985
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.82.2.570
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of a single chromosome in the normal human genome essential for suppression of hamster cell transformation.

Abstract: Normal human fibroblasts were fused to carcinogen-transformed baby hamster kidney (BHK) cells and found to be able to suppress the anchorage-independent transformed phenotype of the hamster cells. This suppression was not due to interspecies incompatibility, for transformation could be effectively expressed in hybrids if either the human or

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0
4

Year Published

1985
1985
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
39
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Thrombospondin has a number of regulatory elements in its complex promoter region, including AP-1, AP-2, Spl, SRE, and many others. It has already been reported that thrombospondin gene expression is dependent on the expression of an unknown tumor suppressor gene, which is presumably located on human chromosome 1 (30). Inactivation of this chromosome 1-related gene following transformation resulted in the inactivation of thrombospondin and the loss of angiogenesis-suppressing activity (9,27).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thrombospondin has a number of regulatory elements in its complex promoter region, including AP-1, AP-2, Spl, SRE, and many others. It has already been reported that thrombospondin gene expression is dependent on the expression of an unknown tumor suppressor gene, which is presumably located on human chromosome 1 (30). Inactivation of this chromosome 1-related gene following transformation resulted in the inactivation of thrombospondin and the loss of angiogenesis-suppressing activity (9,27).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However the rapidity with which human chromosomes are lost still provides a serious obstacle since reexpression of malignancy is usually associated with the loss of multiple chromosomes. It is therefore not surprising that both of these approaches have usually failed to identify specific suppressor chromosomes although there are a few notable exceptions to this (Klinger, 1982;Evans et al, 1982;Stoler & Bouck, 1985).…”
Section: Tumour Suppressor Genesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Screening of genetic databases revealed the possible location on chromosome 1 of a locus with a malignant transformation suppression activity (Stoler and Bouck, 1985). Because of syntheny with mouse chromosome 4, the locus identi®ed by Stodler and Bouck is likely to map on 1p, distal to 1p22.1 (Zabel et al, 1985).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%