2006
DOI: 10.5424/sjar/2006041-175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of autochthonous grapevine varieties in the germplasm collection at the ITA of "Castilla y León" in Zamadueñas Station, Valladolid, Spain

Abstract: During the last decades a study of the grapevine collection located at the Zamadueñas Station of the Instituto Tecnológico Agrario de Castilla y León (ITACyL) was carried out. Recently, molecular markers have been used for varietal identification and detection of the possible synonymies in the collection. This work shows the results of that characterisation, as well as the detected synonymies and homonymies in the study. The maintenance of the existing plant material is recommended, particularly with reference… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Castellana Blanca originated from the Rueda region (Spain) and is also known as Tolociriana and Temprana Agosteña (Yuste et al 2006). Cigüente is considered a Spanish autochthonous cultivar and was first cited by Herrera (1513).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Castellana Blanca originated from the Rueda region (Spain) and is also known as Tolociriana and Temprana Agosteña (Yuste et al 2006). Cigüente is considered a Spanish autochthonous cultivar and was first cited by Herrera (1513).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These profiles have not been previously reported, and most of them belong to autochthonous varieties ('Calagraña', 'Cenicienta', 'Juliana', and 'Pan y Carne'), from which no previous written references or plant material in other grape collections have been found. These kind of cultivars are in a marked risk of extinction, since only isolated (Yuste et al 2006). …”
Section: Synonymies and Homonymiesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…DNA genotyping by microsatellite markers (SSRs) is considered the best method for grapevine cultivar identification (Thomas and Scott, 1993), besides allowing the detection of synonyms and homonyms (Maletic et al, 1999;Martín et al, 2003;Yuste et al, 2006), as well as having applications in pedigree reconstruction (Bautista et al, 2008). Accurate identification of cultivars together with a phenological, sanitary (Zdunic et al, 2007), agronomical (Pommer et al, 2000) and ampelographic (Martínez and Pérez, 2000) descriptions will enable a better knowledge of the genetic heritage of grapevines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%