2017
DOI: 10.1186/s13104-017-2457-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of cattle, buffaloes and rodents as reservoir animals of Leptospira in the District of Gampaha, Sri Lanka

Abstract: BackgroundLeptospirosis is an important emerging infectious disease in Sri Lanka. Rats are the most important reservoir of Leptospira but domestic and wild mammals may also act as important maintenance or accidental hosts. In Sri Lanka, knowledge of reservoir animals of leptospires is poor. The objective of this study was to identify potential reservoir animals of Leptospira in the District of Gampaha, Sri Lanka.FindingsBlood and kidney samples were collected from 38 rodents and mid-stream urine samples were r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
18
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For this reason, we included saprophytic strains (L. biflexa strain Patoc I, L. biflexa strain CH 11, and L. meyeri strain Veldrat Semarang 173) in our panel diagnostic, which can cross-react with the antibodies generated by some pathogenic serovars. Possible explanations for the fact that none of the cats with antibodies against pathogenic leptospires had antibodies against the saprophytic serovars included in our MAT panel, could be that they have not either specific cross-reactivity against the used saprophytic ones or because as it has been described previously, the saprophytic serovars, specifically serovar Patoc, has limited ability to detect cross-reactions with antibodies of past infections [47].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…For this reason, we included saprophytic strains (L. biflexa strain Patoc I, L. biflexa strain CH 11, and L. meyeri strain Veldrat Semarang 173) in our panel diagnostic, which can cross-react with the antibodies generated by some pathogenic serovars. Possible explanations for the fact that none of the cats with antibodies against pathogenic leptospires had antibodies against the saprophytic serovars included in our MAT panel, could be that they have not either specific cross-reactivity against the used saprophytic ones or because as it has been described previously, the saprophytic serovars, specifically serovar Patoc, has limited ability to detect cross-reactions with antibodies of past infections [47].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The red color of the supernatant after urine centrifugation either due to the presence of hemoglobin or myoglobin should be further differentiated by chemical analysis (Giannitti et al, 2014;Braun et al, 2008). Certain microorganisms can also be detected in urine employing either microscopy or molecular techniques (Denipitiya et al, 2017).…”
Section: Urinalysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rodents, cattle, buffaloes, horses, sheep, goats, pigs and dogs are the most common reservoirs. [3][4][5] The disease is transmitted mainly by direct or indirect contact with water sources or soil contaminated with urine of infected animals. 6 Major life threatening complications of leptospirosis reported in recent outbreaks in Sri Lanka which include renal failure 7 , haemorrhage into most organs and tissues and multi organ failure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%