2003
DOI: 10.1002/nme.801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of coating defects in cathodically protected underground pipelines

Abstract: SUMMARYCoating defects may occur, for many di erent reasons, at some points on the surface of a cathodically protected structure. These defects behave anodically and may cause strong localized corrosion. It is possible to identify the position of coating defects by using measured values of the electrochemical potential at some points in the electrolyte or on its surface. To achieve this, an inverse BEM-based genetic algorithm is developed to identify the position of defects in cathodically protected undergroun… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Resistance plotted against the size of the defect on a buried pipe when cathodic protection is applied for 25 minutesThe resistance increased at the initial stage when the defect was initiated and decreased drastically between 0.3 and 0.4 cm 2 before beginning to drop slightly and then increased with an increase in the number of defects. This is as a result of the adhesive strength of the coating observed at the substrate as a result of more defects and in consonant with Miltiadou & Wrobel[28]. At this point,…”
supporting
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Resistance plotted against the size of the defect on a buried pipe when cathodic protection is applied for 25 minutesThe resistance increased at the initial stage when the defect was initiated and decreased drastically between 0.3 and 0.4 cm 2 before beginning to drop slightly and then increased with an increase in the number of defects. This is as a result of the adhesive strength of the coating observed at the substrate as a result of more defects and in consonant with Miltiadou & Wrobel[28]. At this point,…”
supporting
confidence: 77%
“…The resistance increased at the initial stage when the defect was initiated and decreased drastically between 0.3 and 0.4 cm 2 before beginning to drop slightly and then increased with an increase in the number of defects. This is as a result of the adhesive strength of the coating observed at the substrate as a result of more defects and in consonant with Miltiadou & Wrobel [28]. At this point, IOP Publishing doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1178/1/012002 10 the protective barrier is broken due to the time spent by the substrate in the electrolyte leading to a decrease in resistance [13,29].…”
Section: Plate 5 Features Observed On Sample After Lpr Scansupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This feature makes the BEM an ideal tool for modeling problems involving infinite and semi‐infinite domains. The BEM has been successfully utilized to analyze CP systems in ships (DeGiorgi & Wimmer, 2005; Iwata et al., 1992; Kalovelonis et al., 2019; Zamani, 1988), offshore structures (Amaya & Aoki, 2003), buried pipelines (Lan et al., 2002; Cicognani et al., 1990; Rodopoulos et al., 2019; Tang et al., 2009), underground structures (Abootalebi et al., 2010; Aoki et al., 2004; Miltiadou & Wrobel, 2003), and steel‐reinforced concrete (Ridha et al., 2001; Santos et al., 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%