2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0045-7949(02)00086-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of damage parameters for jointed rock

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The back analysis method for identifying the properties of the materials is essentially equivalent to the problem of identification of the material parameters P (in this case, damage tensor X) by observing the loadst on the part S u of the boundary S u , where the displacementsû are given, or by observing the displacementsū on the part S t of the boundary S t where the loadst are given [13][14][15]. The model is symbolically shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Constitutive Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The back analysis method for identifying the properties of the materials is essentially equivalent to the problem of identification of the material parameters P (in this case, damage tensor X) by observing the loadst on the part S u of the boundary S u , where the displacementsû are given, or by observing the displacementsū on the part S t of the boundary S t where the loadst are given [13][14][15]. The model is symbolically shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Constitutive Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kan and Li and Zhang [19,20] analyzed the settlement pattern of buildings produced by tunnel construction using the finite difference method (FDM). Godinho et al [21][22][23] applied finite element calculation procedures combined with neural networks and other methods to investigate the environmental changes caused by tunnel excavation. In addition, they analyzed the changes and proposed corresponding prediction tools.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a robust inverse identification technique that can reliably estimate parameter values based on available experimental observations is crucially important in order to achieve satisfactory predictability of the damage constitutive model. Most of the existing inverse parameter estimation methods apply optimization techniques in order to minimize cost functions that represent differences between numerical simulation results and experimental test data in terms of displacements (Ghaboussi et al, 1998;Lauro et al, 2001;Xiang et al, 2002), loads (Brunet et al, 2004;Kuna and Abendroth, 2004), both displacements and forces (Abendroth and Kuna, 2006;Munoz-Rojas et al, 2010), or modal characteristics such as natural frequencies and/or mode shapes, etc. (Friswell, 2007;Singh, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%