2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2017.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of induced and naturally occurring conductive hearing loss in mice using bone conduction

Abstract: While many mouse models of hearing loss have been described, a significant fraction of the genetic defects in these models affect both the inner ear and middle ears. A common method used to separate inner-ear (sensory-neural) from middle-ear (conductive) pathologies in the hearing clinic is the combination of air-conduction and bone-conduction audiometry. In this report, we investigate the use of air- and bone-conducted evoked auditory brainstem responses to perform a similar separation in mice. We describe a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Long-term conductive hearing loss is known to lead to speech intelligibility deficits in patients and loss of synapses in an animal model of conductive hearing loss ( Liberman et al, 2015 ; Okada et al, 2020 ). Future murine studies should therefore quantify air- and bone-conduction evoked ABRs ( Qin et al, 2010 ; Chhan et al, 2017 ) to further delineate conductive vs. sensorineural contribution to HL in Coch –/– mice. In addition, future clinical studies should evaluate for potential presence of conductive hearing loss in patients with COCH pathogenic variants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Long-term conductive hearing loss is known to lead to speech intelligibility deficits in patients and loss of synapses in an animal model of conductive hearing loss ( Liberman et al, 2015 ; Okada et al, 2020 ). Future murine studies should therefore quantify air- and bone-conduction evoked ABRs ( Qin et al, 2010 ; Chhan et al, 2017 ) to further delineate conductive vs. sensorineural contribution to HL in Coch –/– mice. In addition, future clinical studies should evaluate for potential presence of conductive hearing loss in patients with COCH pathogenic variants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A hallmark of sensorineural hearing loss, widened peripheral frequency tuning, is considered a key reason for why individuals with sensorineural damage often struggle to understand speech in noisy backgrounds 49 . In contrast, CHL has been assumed to leave peripheral frequency tuning intact, based on assessments of both bottom-up input to the auditory nerve measured via bone conduction thresholds and hair cell counts 19 , 20 . Despite this, converging evidence shows that CHL (occurring either during development or adulthood) impairs speech comprehension in noise 12 17 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CHL is broadly used as a model to understand how auditory deprivation affects the central auditory system as it has been assumed to leave the peripheral auditory region intact 19 , 20 . In addition to attenuating sound energy reaching the cochlea by disrupting sound transmission in the outer or middle ear, CHL can cause changes in the central auditory pathway 21 26 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The further observation that otitis media caused similar cochlear de-efferentation and cochlear-nerve synaptopathy to that seen after TM removal ( Fig 6 ) strongly suggests that it is the loss of acoustic drive that caused the changes in cochlear efferent and afferent innervation densities, rather than some other effect of the TM surgery, such as transient acoustic trauma from manipulation of the eardrum. Further evidence is provided by the demonstration that complete TM removal in mouse causes minimal changes in bone-conduction thresholds, even when coupled with the more traumatic procedure of removing the malleus [ 36 ]. The fact that all experimental groups underwent anesthetization and minor pinna surgery on each cochlear-function test day (see Methods ) strongly suggests that it is the TM removal that caused the cochlear degeneration, rather than some less specific effect of anesthetization or surgical stress: the TM removal maneuver itself is exceedingly brief.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%