2022
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-022-10657-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of key factors limiting topsoil organic carbon in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The RIs of MAT and MAP for SOC density prediction were 20.90% and 14.93%, and 15.69% and 14.70% in 2005 and 2020, respectively (Figure 7). Temperature was the most important factor governing changes in SOC density at the regional scale, which is consistent with most results in the literature for Northeast China [46,47]. Increased surface temperature and evapotranspiration increase plant respiration rate, accelerate the decomposition of soil organic matter, thereby reducing the content of SOC [48].…”
Section: The Drving Factors Of Soc Prediction Modelssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The RIs of MAT and MAP for SOC density prediction were 20.90% and 14.93%, and 15.69% and 14.70% in 2005 and 2020, respectively (Figure 7). Temperature was the most important factor governing changes in SOC density at the regional scale, which is consistent with most results in the literature for Northeast China [46,47]. Increased surface temperature and evapotranspiration increase plant respiration rate, accelerate the decomposition of soil organic matter, thereby reducing the content of SOC [48].…”
Section: The Drving Factors Of Soc Prediction Modelssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In this study, the total carbon storage in the grassland ecosystem of the Northern Tibetan Plateau was estimated to be about 4.08 Pg C, including 0.58 Pg C in the vegetation carbon pool (including aboveground and belowground biomass carbon), 2.58 Pg C in the soil carbon pool, and the remainder stored in the bare land. Several recent studies have estimated carbon storage on the Tibetan Plateau mainly through field surveys, remote sensing estimation, and model simulation (Yang et al, 2009b; Liu and Liu, 2014). However, those estimation results still have great variability due to different sampling times, different areas, different calculation methods, and different models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%