2016
DOI: 10.15835/nbha44110289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of Land Suitability for Agricultural Use by Applying Morphometric and Risk Parameters Based on GIS Spatial Analysis

Abstract: Agricultural land is one of the main resources for the development of rural communities and the peripheries of urban centres. An area of 936 km 2 , belonging to Intercommunity Association for Development Alba-Iulia, Transylvania region, Romania, was analysed in order to identify suitable land for agricultural use. This approach represents the stage preceding the identification of crops favourability for agricultural land, thus reducing the time and resources needed for the proper land evaluation mark. The exte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to establish landslides probability classes for the studied territory, it was applied a statistical model that takes into account the principles of statistical bivariate analysis so that the landslides become the dependent variables for determining the statistical influence of the causal and triggering coefficients which represent the independent variables. This type of analysis has provided good results for territories of different sizes in different study regions previously performed [27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Database and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to establish landslides probability classes for the studied territory, it was applied a statistical model that takes into account the principles of statistical bivariate analysis so that the landslides become the dependent variables for determining the statistical influence of the causal and triggering coefficients which represent the independent variables. This type of analysis has provided good results for territories of different sizes in different study regions previously performed [27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Database and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The analysis of the land-use highlights the agricultural character of the study area, so the largest area of land is occupied with arable land not irrigated (295.41 km 2 ), meadows (248.12 km 2 ) and deciduous forests (191.35 km 2 ) (Table 10). Agricultural work, ploughing and sowing operations, which do not meet the technical requirements (ploughing and sowing on hill slope direction), cause the rainwater to flow faster into the soil, thus creating favourable conditions for excessive soil wetness and sliding land for areas with clay and semi-clay geological substrate [29,31]. In the analysed area, the deciduous forests play a dual role in the landslides: they primarily have the role of stabilizing and mitigating surface erosion for the low slopes of the low hills, and secondly they play a destabilizing role for inclined slopes due to overloading (Figures 11 and 12).…”
Section: Land-use Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking this into consideration, to achieve the purpose of the research, a complex GIS model of spatial analysis was developed (based on qualitative and quantitative analysis), composed of secondary models developed for nine crops: barley, corn, potato, wheat, beetroot, soy, green peas, beans and sunflower. The model is based on a digital database formed by raster and vector structures that are managed through geoinformatic software [9][10][11]. The result is represented by raster and vector databases, which spatially identify the territorial areas with the best quality score for the development of agricultural land [12][13][14][15] or to identify favourable or restrictive conditions for different plant [16,17] or forest species [18,19].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time required for bioremediation of oil-polluted soils within the study area varies between 17 and 36 weeks (i.e., 119 and 252 days), a higher rate than in other case studies in similar articles, 45 days in the case of bioremediation using vermicompost [43], 49 days in the case of bioremediation with Ricinus communis L. enzymes [44], 187 days in the case of remediation by persulphate oxidation coupled with microbial degradation [45] but the differences are due to the technology applied and the degree of initial soil pollution. Because hydrocarbons stay in the soil for a very long time, biostimulation and bioaugmentation techniques must be used to dispose of them [46][47][48].…”
Section: Bioremediation Of Polluted Soilmentioning
confidence: 99%