2022
DOI: 10.3390/medicina58050681
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of Multiple Hub Genes in Acute Kidney Injury after Kidney Transplantation by Bioinformatics Analysis

Abstract: Background and Objectives: The molecular mechanisms of the development of acute kidney injury (AKI) after kidney transplantation are not yet clear. The aim of this study was to confirm the genes and mechanisms related to AKI after transplantation. Materials and Methods: To investigate potential genetic targets for AKI, an analysis of the gene expression omnibus database was used to identify key genes and pathways. After identification of differentially expressed genes, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genome pa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hub genes could act as biomarkers of kidney injury, which might be applied to estimate the severity of kidney injury and verify the effectiveness of treatments over time. [24][25][26] In this study, the top 10 hub genes with the highest degrees from PPI network analyses were Il-6, Ptk2, Stat3, Kras, Jun, Mapk14, Myd88, Mmp9, Itga6, and Cd4. Some of the genes identified in this analysis have been reported previously to be related to AKI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Hub genes could act as biomarkers of kidney injury, which might be applied to estimate the severity of kidney injury and verify the effectiveness of treatments over time. [24][25][26] In this study, the top 10 hub genes with the highest degrees from PPI network analyses were Il-6, Ptk2, Stat3, Kras, Jun, Mapk14, Myd88, Mmp9, Itga6, and Cd4. Some of the genes identified in this analysis have been reported previously to be related to AKI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%