2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2013.07.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of novel micropollutants in wastewater by a combination of suspect and nontarget screening

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
174
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 229 publications
(175 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
174
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, a universal tR prediction model, which does not need unreasonable efforts for calibration and takes into consideration neutral and ionic compounds, would contribute a lot in further evaluation of the data [32]. A gap also exists for in-silico fragmentation models, lacking mainly in giving fragments, reasonable for each ionization mode and according to specific rules.…”
Section: Future Needs and Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, a universal tR prediction model, which does not need unreasonable efforts for calibration and takes into consideration neutral and ionic compounds, would contribute a lot in further evaluation of the data [32]. A gap also exists for in-silico fragmentation models, lacking mainly in giving fragments, reasonable for each ionization mode and according to specific rules.…”
Section: Future Needs and Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, highly sophisticated, comprehensive, stepwise workflows were also presented by Moschet et al [31] and Hug et al [32] for suspect and non-target screening of pesticides and EPs, including TPs in their suspect lists. However, it is still challenging to profile TPs in environment samples, since they are formed through many possible reactions, automatic workflows for the identification are not readily available, so manual data inspection is necessary, though time consuming, and, finally, there are no standards available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5] Hug et al 6) and Schymanski et al 7) found novel micropollutants and transformation products in their nontarget strategy. In this study, we used two automated methods, MAGMa 8) and MetFrag/MetFusion, 9,10) to identify compounds in an urban aquatic environment and evaluate the two methods using the results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was selected, as explained in the article, as a means to investigate highly consumed/more common drugs and pharmaceuticals, to focus on those of higher commercial importance. This is a known technique to limit the number of possible compounds to focus on, utilised in other non-target methods (GagoFerrero et al, 2015;Hug et al, 2014;Little et al, 2012). It does simplify the non-target process, however in doing so, many "potential positive" compounds could be ignored, and, at the same time, some false positives could be included.…”
Section: Figure 22: Structures Of Benzocaine (Left) and Phenylalaninmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, subsequent steps must then be made to reduce the number of peaks to a more manageable number, including molecular formula derivation, isotopic pattern, mass defect analysis and retention time prediction Kind and Fiehn, 2007). Further confidence in the "potential positives" remaining can be gained through the use of fragmentation in a subsequent MS/MS injection and comparison with in silico fragmentation and/or mass spectral libraries Herrera-Lopez et al, 2014;Hug et al, 2014;Little et al, 2012), with the latter referred to as "hidden targets" (Letzel et al, 2015). In these situations, it is of prime importance and for ease of the analyst to have software capable of fulfilling most (if not all) of these steps automatically.…”
Section: High Resolution Mass Spectrometry (Hrms) Instruments Such Amentioning
confidence: 99%