2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2015.06.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of odour-active compounds of pasteurised orange juice using multidimensional gas chromatography techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a long time, conventional detection methods such as gas chromatography [2] and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry [3] have been applied to the detection of gases in fruits and vegetables, but these instruments are expensive and time-consuming. In recent years, research in this area has used machine vision [4] and near-infrared spectroscopy [5] however, these methods were not able to characterize the bacteria.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a long time, conventional detection methods such as gas chromatography [2] and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry [3] have been applied to the detection of gases in fruits and vegetables, but these instruments are expensive and time-consuming. In recent years, research in this area has used machine vision [4] and near-infrared spectroscopy [5] however, these methods were not able to characterize the bacteria.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of such OAs, not discriminative because they were detected by all the panelists and delivered the highest NIF values in all the samples, was inferior to 10% of the detected OAs, as recommended by Etievant and Chaintreau [41] to allow olfactive discrimination between samples in GC-O, thus validating the extract concentrations chosen for our study [40]. Other OAs were also found in all the samples at common lower levels, for instance, 2-methylpropanal (OA n • 2), ethyl propanoate (6), 3-hydroxybutan-2-one (18), 2-ethenyl-6-methylpyrazine (35), acetylpyrazine (43), 1-phenylethyl acetate (48, coeluted with another ester: methyl 2-methylpentanoate), 2,3,5-trimethyl-6-(3-methylbutyl)pyrazine (49), 1H-pyrrole-2-carbaldehyde (69), and nonanoic acid (78). Most of them were also previously identified in cocoa or chocolate categories (Table 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the current literature, values varied from this lower level to a 50% NIF threshold [34,47,48]. Owing to the number of odor events detected by the panelists in the 12 samples, illustrating the odorous richness and sensory diversity of the dark chocolates under study, and the number of replicates per sample (12 or 10), a 50% threshold was applied, as also chosen by others [47][48][49]. This meant an OA was finally retained as…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These latter two compounds are typical reaction products of acid-catalysed degradation of limonene and β-linalool, formed at high temperatures and may be recognized as compounds causing off-flavour when present in high concentrations (Bazemore, Goodner & Rouseff 1999;Mastello et al, 2015;Perez-Cacho & Rouseff, 2008b). A temperature dependent increase of both compounds was found in PEF treated juice, when the maximum temperatures of the treatment exceeded 69 °C (juice B).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…compounds that have been shown to be aroma active in GC-Olfactometry studies and that have been identified as relevant for orange juice flavour by two or more independent research groups. d Impact on processed orange juice, from GC-Olfactometry studies, according to Perez-Cacho & Rouseff 2008b and Bazemore, Goodner and Rouseff 1999. e Impact on processed orange juice, from GC-Olfactometry studies, according to Rouseff 2008b andMastello et al 2015. f reported by Shaw 1991, not …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%