2017
DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000000745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of optimal mask size parameter for noise filtering in 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate bone scintigraphy images

Abstract: Tc-methylene diphosphonate (Tc-MDP) bone scintigraphy images have limited number of counts per pixel. A noise filtering method based on local statistics of the image produces better results than a linear filter. However, the mask size has a significant effect on image quality. In this study, we have identified the optimal mask size that yields a good smooth bone scan image. Forty four bone scan images were processed using mask sizes 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, and 15 pixels. The input and processed images were reviewe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

4
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although not directly related to our study; studies have been conducted for reducing noise levels in planar [2,3,35–37], SPECT [4,38–42] and PET images [43,44]. These studies do not involve neural networks for noise reduction, however.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although not directly related to our study; studies have been conducted for reducing noise levels in planar [2,3,35–37], SPECT [4,38–42] and PET images [43,44]. These studies do not involve neural networks for noise reduction, however.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Filtering operations can be performed in either spatial domain or in frequency domain. In spatial domain filtering, the appropriate size of the filter is required so that the filtered image is not over-smooth and preserves the clinical details [3]. In frequency domain filtering, finding the optimal cutoff frequency is important since a lower cutoff frequency produces a smooth image but certain clinical details might be lost, whereas a higher cutoff frequency preserves the clinical details but the filtered image may still be noisy [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several image enhancements have been proposed and evaluated for nuclear medicine images, and some of these have been implemented by vendors and come as a part of image processing software package with SPECT/CT or PET/CT scanner. [ 14 15 16 17 18 ] NM Physicians/NM Technologists use some of these in nuclear medicine practice as per their comfort levels. We have not compared the result of our study with any of such routinely used software tool for image enhancement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Richardson-Lucy algorithm was used by Sasi et al [20] for deblurring of cardiac single-photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT) images using maximum-likelihood estimation of the PSF. Several studies related to enhancing bone scan images have been performed [21][22][23][24][25]. However, there is no study that is directly related to the restoration of planar Tc-99 m MDP bone scan images using the Richardson-Lucy algorithm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%