1991
DOI: 10.1016/0304-3940(91)90847-m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of oxytoxin cells in the rat supraoptic nucleus by their response to cholecystokinin injection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
43
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Selective effects of peripherally administered CCK on the activity of central neurons have been described previously (26). Leng et al (26) reported that CCK differentially influenced the discharge of neurons in the supraoptic nucleus of hypothalamus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Selective effects of peripherally administered CCK on the activity of central neurons have been described previously (26). Leng et al (26) reported that CCK differentially influenced the discharge of neurons in the supraoptic nucleus of hypothalamus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…A change in discharge rate in response to CCK was measured by comparing the resting level of discharge prior to CCK administration with the discharge rate directly corresponding to the nadir of the depressor response. The doses of CCK were chosen on the basis of previous reports (26,31,41) and also by performing preliminary experiments that determined the threshold for the effects of CCK on arterial blood pressure, RVLM unit discharge, and sympathetic nerve discharge.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In agreement with the higher levels of NO IF and cGMPir found in VP neurones, blockade of NO production with 7-NI, a relatively specific blocker of the nNOS isoform (Moore et al 1993;MacKenzie et al 1994), resulted in a stronger excitation in phasically active as compared to continuously active MNCs. While the expression of phasic and continuous firing patterns in vivo distinguishes VP from OT neurones, respectively (Poulain & Wakerley, 1982;Leng et al 1991), the use of firing patterns to classify MNCs in vitro is more conflicting. While the expression of phasic activity in vitro is still a consistent feature found in the majority of VP neurones (Yamashita et al 1983;Cobbett et al 1986;Armstrong et al 1994), continuous activity, though more often associated with OT neurones (Yamashita et al 1987;Yang & Hatton, 1994), does not conclusively differentiate between the two (Armstrong, 1995).…”
Section: Basally Produced No Modulates Ongoing Firing Activity Of Sonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of a strict association of neurones with DAPs and spike clustering over this time frame suggests another mechanism is involved. In vivo, continuous activity can characterize both cell types, as judged by the response to stimuli selective for VP or OT release or inhibition (Brimble & Dyball, 1977;Poulain et al 1977;Renaud et al 1987;Leng et al 1991;, but is more characteristic of putative OT neurones. Typically, putative VP neurones exhibit this behaviour either in transition to phasic bursting, injection, and double-labelled seven of these ten with an A few of the OT neurones exhibiting a DAP in this study could be made to fire phasically in a manner similar to VP neurones by adjusting membrane potential.…”
Section: Firing Patterns Of Ot and Vp Neuronesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This tradition, based so strongly on the earlier, elegant studies in vivo of Wakerley and others (Poulain & Wakerley, 1982), has perhaps placed undue importance on a single facet of a cell's behaviour for in vitro studies, and this behaviour, which in the whole animal is under the complex control of a mixture of synaptic inputs and intrinsic membrane properties, may not be as selectively expressed in a significant percentage of neurones in vitro, at least, certainly not at all times. Even in vivo, physiological tests may yield ambiguous results for 10-15 % of the neurones (Leng et al 1991). It has recently been possible to record intracellularly, albeit briefly, from supraoptic neurones in vivo (Dyball, Tasker, Wuarin & Dudek, 1991; Bourque &G , and an understanding of the differences in synaptic inputs between the two cells could be forthcoming with improvements in this technique.…”
Section: Firing Patterns Of Ot and Vp Neuronesmentioning
confidence: 99%