2016
DOI: 10.1111/nph.13999
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of peanut (Arachis hypogaea) chromosomes using a fluorescence in situ hybridization system reveals multiple hybridization events during tetraploid peanut formation

Abstract: The cultivated peanut Arachis hypogaea (AABB) is thought to have originated from the hybridization of Arachis duranensis (AA) and Arachis ipaënsis (BB) followed by spontaneous chromosome doubling. In this study, we cloned and analyzed chromosome markers from cultivated peanut and its wild relatives. A fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)-based karyotyping cocktail was developed with which to study the karyotypes and chromosome evolution of peanut and its wild relatives. Karyotypes were constructed in cult… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
0
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
3
31
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Peaks in LTR retrotransposons are footprints of these insertion events, demonstrating a major burst of amplification in all four genome sets around 1-2 Mya, and revealing an additional burst only in the A t subgenome, which contributed to a larger genome size than that of the suspected progenitor ( Figure 4C). Strikingly, this A t -specific activation of TEs occurred around $0.2 Mya before/during allopolyploid formation, indicating that the two subgenomes independently asymmetrically evolved, implying the possibility of another wild A-genome diploid as the donor for the A t subgenome of A. hypogaea, or multiple hybridization events of the B progenitor, A. ipaensis, with different varieties of A. duranensis, to form the present-day cultivated peanut (Zhang et al, 2016). Asymmetric evolution was also reflected by the genomic signature of selection; there were 694 positively selected genes (PSGs), with significantly more PSGs in the A t subgenome (395 PSGs) than in the B t subgenome (299 PSGs, P < 0.01, Fisher's exact test; Figure 4D).…”
Section: Asymmetric Evolution Of the Two Subgenomes Of A Hypogaeamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peaks in LTR retrotransposons are footprints of these insertion events, demonstrating a major burst of amplification in all four genome sets around 1-2 Mya, and revealing an additional burst only in the A t subgenome, which contributed to a larger genome size than that of the suspected progenitor ( Figure 4C). Strikingly, this A t -specific activation of TEs occurred around $0.2 Mya before/during allopolyploid formation, indicating that the two subgenomes independently asymmetrically evolved, implying the possibility of another wild A-genome diploid as the donor for the A t subgenome of A. hypogaea, or multiple hybridization events of the B progenitor, A. ipaensis, with different varieties of A. duranensis, to form the present-day cultivated peanut (Zhang et al, 2016). Asymmetric evolution was also reflected by the genomic signature of selection; there were 694 positively selected genes (PSGs), with significantly more PSGs in the A t subgenome (395 PSGs) than in the B t subgenome (299 PSGs, P < 0.01, Fisher's exact test; Figure 4D).…”
Section: Asymmetric Evolution Of the Two Subgenomes Of A Hypogaeamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Telomeric and centromeric repeat probes were used to investigate the evolutionary relationship among cultivated peanut and wild species. Multiple hybridization events reportedly occur during tetraploid peanut formation [23]. Four repetitive oligo probes capable of staining the chromosomes of 51 Arachis species con rmed the relationships among the A, B, K, F, E, and H genomes [32].…”
Section: Applications Of the New Oligo Probesmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Both C-banding [19] and uorescent in situ hybridization banding [20] can effectively identify chromosomal structural variants. Although 5S and 45S rDNA [21], telomeres [22], and bacterial arti cial chromosome (BAC) probes [23] have been developed in peanut, the cytogenetic markers in chromosomal identi cation is still very insu cient. Furthermore, the preparation of these markers is time-consuming and expensive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, variations exist between Arachis du-Arachis duranensis varieties from different geographic regions reveal both numeric and positional variations of ITRs in their chromosomes, which are similar to the variations in tetraploid peanut varieties. These results provide evidence for the origin of cultivated peanut from the two diploid ancestors, and suggest that multiple hybridization events of Arachis ipaënsis with different varieties of Arachis duranensis may have occurred during the evolution of cultivated peanut (Figure 1) [1] [2]. The multiple hybridization hypothesis has also been partially supported by the results of genome sequencing for cultivated peanut and the two putative progenitors [3] [4] [5] [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%