2020
DOI: 10.1002/pbc.28719
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of prognostic factors in childhood T‐cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Results from DFCI ALL Consortium Protocols 05‐001 and 11‐001

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(141 reference statements)
2
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“… 42 Therefore, early detection of these variants at diagnosis could further refine risk stratification in HHD which is usually associated with favorable prognosis but still contributes to a significant proportion of relapses in the current treatment era. Regarding T-ALL, those harboring PI3K pathway mutations had an inferior prognosis as previously reported by our group 43 and others. 44,45 Furthermore, RNA-seq identified several dysregulated signaling pathways in T-ALL that may represent novel therapeutic targets for a patient population in whom treatment of primary refractory and recurrent disease remains suboptimal.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“… 42 Therefore, early detection of these variants at diagnosis could further refine risk stratification in HHD which is usually associated with favorable prognosis but still contributes to a significant proportion of relapses in the current treatment era. Regarding T-ALL, those harboring PI3K pathway mutations had an inferior prognosis as previously reported by our group 43 and others. 44,45 Furthermore, RNA-seq identified several dysregulated signaling pathways in T-ALL that may represent novel therapeutic targets for a patient population in whom treatment of primary refractory and recurrent disease remains suboptimal.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Some studies did not find significant differences in T-ALL/LBL and ETP-ALL/LBL outcomes, though this may be attributed to incomplete immunophenotyping, small sample size, or suboptimal tissue limiting analysis 11,14,15,19. A recent multicenter study correlated ETP with lower rates of CR and event-free survival, but similar OS; the authors describe ETP as prognostically significant and recommend investigation of novel therapeutics during induction but acknowledge uncertainty beyond induction therapy 20. Postinduction treatment intensification, driven by disproportionately higher MRD in ETP-ALL/LBL, may be confounding outcomes and leading to disparate conclusions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In ALL, which is characterized by aggressive outgrowth of BM lymphoblasts of either B-cell (B-ALL) or T-cell (T-ALL) origin, MRD is a fundamental prognostic factor, broadly used to define different risks of relapse and to guide clinical decisions, especially for treatment intensification by hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), both in adult and children setting [ 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 ]. Originally, seminal studies in pediatric ALL have represented a leading clinical experience of MFC-MRD use in hematologic patients [ 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 ].…”
Section: Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (All)mentioning
confidence: 99%