1991
DOI: 10.1080/09541449108406221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of spatially quantised tachistoscopic images of faces: How many pixels does it take to carry identity?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
110
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
20
110
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although images of people certainly do contain a lot of information about superficial fine-scale aspects of the face, if these are not diagnostic of identity, a match without them is likely to improve performance. This notion is, in fact, consistent with research on spatial scale in face recognition, which suggests that identity tends to be carried at low spatial scales (Bachmann, 1991;Harmon & Julesz, 1973; though see Schyns & Oliva, 1997, for an argument that extraction of information from different spatial scales is more flexible when the task is to identify a specific image of a face).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Although images of people certainly do contain a lot of information about superficial fine-scale aspects of the face, if these are not diagnostic of identity, a match without them is likely to improve performance. This notion is, in fact, consistent with research on spatial scale in face recognition, which suggests that identity tends to be carried at low spatial scales (Bachmann, 1991;Harmon & Julesz, 1973; though see Schyns & Oliva, 1997, for an argument that extraction of information from different spatial scales is more flexible when the task is to identify a specific image of a face).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…In accordance with the preceding results, Bachmann (1991) found similar data when he pixelized faces at different values (15,18,21,24,27,32,44 and 74 pixels/fw) and showed them at 6 different exposure times (1,4,8,20,40 and 100 ms). The percentage of correct identifications increased with the increase in the SFs, but only when the images with 15 pixels/fw were compared with the remaining pixelization conditions, which did not show differences among them.…”
Section: Empirical Evidence Supporting the Hypothesis Of Anisotropic supporting
confidence: 90%
“…During the test phase the subjects were instructed to recognize faces that were shown on the screen for only 100 ms. Each face in the test phase had 11, 21, and 42 pixels (5.5, 10.5 and 21 cycles/fw, respectively), had been low-pass filtered and had been blurred using Gaussian filters. The results indicated a critical value (8 cycles/fw), below which recognition decreased dramatically (similar results were obtained in parametric studies carried out by Bachmann [1991] and Bhatia, Lakshminarayanan, Samal & Welland [1995]). …”
Section: Empirical Evidence Supporting the Critical Role Of Medium-rasupporting
confidence: 83%
“…This can be achieved by following the Rotakin screen height recommendations provided by the Home Offi ce ( Cohen et al ., 2006 ). The video resolution of CCTV video should be adequate so that target faces do not fall below the minimum pixel count of 16 × 16 pixels otherwise identifi cation will be diffi cult (Bachmann, 1991 ). As a general rule of thumb, CCTV cameras in high-risk environments should record and distribute video at very little compression, high resolution and at a frame rate of 12 fps or above.…”
Section: Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%