2000
DOI: 10.1006/mcpr.2000.0286
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxins A and B genes by PCR-ELISA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Gilligan et al (2000), techniques that use commercial diagnostic kits based on enzymatic immunoassay, as well as OSP and radioimmunoassays are widely used for the staphylococcal enterotoxin detection. However, sensitivity and specificity may vary depending on the purity of the reagents and the level of toxin expression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Gilligan et al (2000), techniques that use commercial diagnostic kits based on enzymatic immunoassay, as well as OSP and radioimmunoassays are widely used for the staphylococcal enterotoxin detection. However, sensitivity and specificity may vary depending on the purity of the reagents and the level of toxin expression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the detection limit and specificity of these methods always depend on having detectable amounts of toxins and may vary significantly according to reagent purity. Since DNA sequence information is available for all described SEs, DNA–DNA hybridization and PCR now offer alternative methods for detection of these genes (Gilligan et al 2000; Johnson et al 1991; McLauchlin et al 2000; Omoe et al 2002). Because of the importance of the enterotoxins on public health and great geographical variation in the distribution of enterotoxigenic strains, in this study, the distribution of the genes that encode SEJ and SEI was analyzed by PCR in S. aureus isolated from bovine mastitis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DRn, change in fluorescence agarose gel electrophoresis to analyze the results of PCR. An innovative ELISA assay was used by Gilligan et al (2000) to detect amplified fragments of entA and entB. Digoxigenin-dUTP was used during amplification to label the amplified DNA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%