2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2008.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of surface-associated proteins in the probiotic bacterium Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
31
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
4
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this purpose, two species were selected. The first one was l. rhamnosus GG, which is a widely studied bacterium because of its claimed probiotic effect on the human health (Servin 2004;Saxelin et al 2005;Sánchez et al 2009). The second one was l. paracasei subsp.…”
Section: Effect Of Lab On the Surface Growth Of G Candidummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, two species were selected. The first one was l. rhamnosus GG, which is a widely studied bacterium because of its claimed probiotic effect on the human health (Servin 2004;Saxelin et al 2005;Sánchez et al 2009). The second one was l. paracasei subsp.…”
Section: Effect Of Lab On the Surface Growth Of G Candidummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been proposed that cell surface proteins are involved in cell protection and surface recognition and that they could be potential mediators in the initial steps involved in autoaggregation and adhesion [8][9][10]. In cell envelope proteome studies of potentially probiotic bacteria, the cell wall protein fraction has typically been extracted by lysozyme-containing buffer [11][12][13][14][15][16], lithium chloride [16,17], or some other cell surface molecule or proteinsolubilizing agent [15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the main functions of these proteins reside in the cytosol, their surface localization was already reported earlier [Deepika et al, 2012;Saad et al, 2009]. This 'aberrant' localization might point towards a moonlighting role for these proteins [Deepika et al, 2012;Izquierdo et al, 2009;Jeffery, 2003;Sanchez et al, 2009a], which has already been documented in other species for the glycolytic enzymes Eno, GapA, and Pgk [Castaldo et al, 2009;Granato et al, 1999;Henderson, 2014;Kinoshita et al, 2008a, b;Sanchez et al, 2009a]. In total, we identified 15 putative cytosolic glycoproteins, 28 glycoproteins in the CWCM fraction, 17 CWA proteins, and 5 SP ( table 1 ).…”
Section: Proteome Fractionationmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Next to their glycolytic activity, these enzymes also play a role in binding to the extracellular environment [Castaldo et al, 2009;Granato et al, 1999;Henderson, 2014;Kinoshita et al, 2008a, b;Sanchez et al, 2009a]. These proteins have potentially also a moonlighting role in L. rhamnosus GG as many observations were made in closely related lactobacilli [Castaldo et al, 2009;Granato et al, 1999;Kinoshita et al, 2008a, b].…”
Section: General Trends In Protein Glycosylationmentioning
confidence: 99%